Talk:Reptron (Go-Bots)

You used all those "saves" for this? Learn how to use the "Preview" box! That way, when we click "recent changes" we can see more than just THIS!--G.B. Blackrock 23:46, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

I don't recal lthe Go-Bots EVER being identified as "Autobots", only "Go-Bots". A cute-ified version of the Autobot sigil may have been used, but without any instance of them being CALLED "Autobots", "Autobots" they should not be categorized as. That sigil is merely the "Go-Bots" sigil... well, one of them. --M Sipher 03:28, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Reptron was in one of the Go-Bots episodes, as a "bad guy". I think the second pair of episodes only ever aired once, and possibly only in NYC - I downloaded them from someplace, but I have no idea where. -LV 01:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

That place would be here. http://chawks.brinkster.net/gb/story/downloads.shtml -- Monzo 03:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

So how do we know that Wreckers guy wasn't Dino-Bot? --ItsWalky 04:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

because it would cause unnecessary confusion and angst among fans? -Derik 04:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Uh what happened to the other pic from Wrecker's. P.S. I think that should be the Pic at the top becuse that's his Clame-to-fame X-BoB58 19:16, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure the cartoon episode he starred in would be his claim to fame, rather than a cameo in an unpublished comic book issue. --ItsWalky 19:35, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

He's a Go-Bot that apeared in a Go-Botas cartoon big whoop, being a member of the Dinobots is something to be proud of. X-BoB58 20:08, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

You know what's something to be proud of? KNOWING HOW TO SPELL. --User:ItsWalky 20:22, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Not realy, it comes naturaly to most peaple. X-BoB58 20:42, 26 May 2006 (UTC) P.S. If you were a bad speller, and then improved your spelling, then that would be something to be proud of.

So hop to it, then. --ItsWalky 21:00, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

*sob* my spelling sucks! -Derik 23:10, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Merge

I don't see why this guy gets two different pages. It's not a repurposing in the classical sense - he's got the same name, same toy, same coloration. Design elements vary but that's mostly a symptom of him fitting in to the appropriate universe. The same character can exist in multiple continuity families - otherwise we'd have double articles for Speedbreaker and Side Burn.--Jimsorenson 16:10, 11 August 2011 (EDT)

The main reason we don't have separate Speedbreaker and Side Burn articles is because the information would be 99% duplicated, not because they're the "same character". —Interrobang 16:21, 11 August 2011 (EDT)

I agree with Interrobang. The articles should remain separate. --ItsWalky 02:34, 7 September 2011 (EDT)