Talk:SUV: Society of Ultimate Villainy
Whoah whoah whoah. Someone wanna actually protect this page from anons like it's supposed to be? --M Sipher 16:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think he's actually doing anything wrong. Looks like this is today's moose episode.--RosicrucianTalk 16:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- It is. Aired this morning. - RolonBolon 16:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- The moose be praised--Carrion 16:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keen. I'll have to check my usual source for the moose, and then I'll be more than happy to start writing summaries.--RosicrucianTalk 16:30, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Moose? I'll have you know Canada is the land of moose AND hockey! Don't forget the best part! ;) --Nightshade83 03:19, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keen. I'll have to check my usual source for the moose, and then I'll be more than happy to start writing summaries.--RosicrucianTalk 16:30, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- The moose be praised--Carrion 16:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- It is. Aired this morning. - RolonBolon 16:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
The legitimacy of this specific edit doesn't matter. The page is supposed to be protected from anons, because I defy you to tell me with a straight face that it WON'T need it, and soon. --M Sipher 16:30, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Got it. - Chris McFeely 16:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- It won't need it. Last week, it was an anon who wrote the summary for A Fistful of Energon. -- SFH 17:03, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- And? --M Sipher 17:09, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- And anons can do good as well as evil. --FFN 17:34, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Again, and? Does this magically negate all the shit that's gone down in the recent past that's the reason the warning templates and protections were put up in the first place? No, it doesn't. --M Sipher 17:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- At this point, you should push for anon editing to be disabled completely (as Toughpigs suggested during the whole Monacoisation thing) if you feel so strongly. If any articles are to be open to anon editing, this one should be opened now. - SanityOrMadness 22:49, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Again, and? Does this magically negate all the shit that's gone down in the recent past that's the reason the warning templates and protections were put up in the first place? No, it doesn't. --M Sipher 17:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- And anons can do good as well as evil. --FFN 17:34, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- And? --M Sipher 17:09, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- It won't need it. Last week, it was an anon who wrote the summary for A Fistful of Energon. -- SFH 17:03, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- That was me that wrote last weeks summary. I was going to do something now too, but I guess I can't. In the meantime someone else can add the trivia that the last three numbers of Archer's, Princess', and Nanosec's mugshot IDs represent the number of the episode they first appeared in.--Raijin K 19:15, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- If you're a registered user, you should be able to write a summary for it. -- SFH 19:16, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Still not seeing any edit button on the page. I think I'm still too "new".--Raijin K 19:19, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Write it in a new section here, or on a sandbox page or somesuch, and ask for it to be moved over... - SanityOrMadness 22:49, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Still not seeing any edit button on the page. I think I'm still too "new".--Raijin K 19:19, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, now someone should unlock it. -- SFH 19:50, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
It means that for the other ones, they still need to be semi-protected. As for this one, the episode has aired in Canada. I don't think it needs to be semi-protected. -- SFH 17:45, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, and now that we have a stable non-stub article to work from, I fully support yoinking the semi-protect from the article.--RosicrucianTalk 03:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Most guest voices?
[edit]Hey... has any other episode so far had three "guest" voices (or more)? Fred, Brian and Kath... --M Sipher 00:05, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Error?
[edit]Didn't Slow-Mo say she used her clock to restore Nanosec's youth, so is it alright if we remove the "Continuity Error"? RyuHane 00:58, 1 June 2008 (UTC) That doesn't explain why he already looks younger in the Jail Mugshots, way before Slo-Mo could possibly even have had an allspark fragment.86.87.28.191 09:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
I can't actually remember when this scene occured, but are you sure it wasn't one for when they get arrested at the end? Thyunda 16:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, it was at the beginning of the second act, right before the SUV committed their first joint caper. So the error stands. --Professor Icepick 17:07, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Arcade video games references
[edit]The arcade that P. Princess attacks has some video games references on its facade. A green mushroom, a red turtle with spikes, a space invaders alien, a Tetris game and a line of yellow dots like in Pacman. Worth mentioning ?--213.49.71.241 08:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Trivia section
[edit]Can someone remove the part that says the Vok reference is the first indication of any non-cybertronian aliens? it's like pretending Along came a spider never happened.86.87.28.191 09:44, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Did anyone notice that the "overload or off button" area is conveniently placed at the height of an 8 year old girl? Do y'all think that we should put that under a trivia section?--AWT88 23:36, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Not really. Who built it? How tall is Professor Princess? Think about it. --Xaaron 23:39, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Wow (he says in self astonishment). I never really took that into consideration, I just assumed that it was one of the other three members.--AWT88 23:44, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Princess in jail?
[edit]- Is it actualy possible that she would go to a regular jail just like the rest of the criminals?--Sunjumper 15:20, 14 August 2009 (EDT)
- Hey, it's the future. The age at which minors are prosecuted as adults has been trending lower and lower historically, so ... --Jimsorenson 15:41, 14 August 2009 (EDT)
- Really? It just strikes me as odd that all she did was attack a toy store and assault an alien robot and a person who does not legally exist...Okay, i stop talking now.--Sunjumper 15:50, 14 August 2009 (EDT)
- Hey, it's the future. The age at which minors are prosecuted as adults has been trending lower and lower historically, so ... --Jimsorenson 15:41, 14 August 2009 (EDT)
- Personally, I always thought Princess was actually an adult in a childlike body, kind of like Baby Herman or something. --Jeysie 16:43, 14 August 2009 (EDT)
