Talk:Tyger Pax

could it be possible that tyger pax is the location on cybertron for the cybertron levels on the console games?

Move?

Since there's a Tyger Pax treaty or whatever from The War Within, shouldn't we move this to 'Tyger Pax (city)' or something? Many of the War Within articles or sections link to this page. --FFN 07:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't see a need to move if we just make this a continuity-neutral page. Move the current content to the Fiction->2007 Movie section and start up a Dreamwave G1 section. After all, the War Within treaty was so named because it was signed at Tyger Pax.--Rosicrucian^Talk 12:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I never read any of the Dreamwave comics beyond the first mini-series, so I was unaware. Anyway, it's done, set up for somebody to write about the War Within appearance. --FFN 13:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Bumblebee at Tyger Pax

Anyone know if this is considered canon? It's not part of the Exodus book, and as far as I can tell it can only be found in an MTV blog post without any sort of Hasbro copyright claims...—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 173.71.105.23 (talk • contribs){{#if:20:26, June 26, 2010 (EDT)| 20:26, June 26, 2010 (EDT)|}}.

If WHAT is considered canon?--76.28.76.206 22:13, 26 June 2010 (EDT)

http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2010/06/22/exclusive-learn-how-bumblebee-lost-his-voice-in-this-short-story-from-exodus-author-alex-irvine/ This—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 173.71.105.23 (talk • contribs){{#if:22:05, June 26, 2010 (EDT)| 22:05, June 26, 2010 (EDT)|}}.

Not canon. But I don't see any reason it wouldn't deserve a pseudocanon treatment like Alignment and Dead Men's Boots. It is exactly the same situation. The creators putting out some unofficial fiction. - Starfield 23:29, 26 June 2010 (EDT)

Continuity identifier

"We don't use continuity family identifiers like that. If you want to see which CF used it first, see what's in the fiction section first." User:ItsWalky (from revision history)

There was a big push by somebody to change all the continuity identifiers from "...in the XXX continuity..." to "...from the XXX continuity..." so that just the first appearance could be listed. It sounded reasonable. I guess the moral of the story is that they should have checked the policy page to see if it backed up their interpretation. It doesn't. Oops. - Starfield 18:05, 8 August 2010 (EDT)

Who was this somebody? I don't like them! --ItsWalky 18:09, 8 August 2010 (EDT)

Sorry about that. I had checked other articles and the ones with continuity identifiers followed the usage I mentioned. The anonymous editor had not used correct English in his edit and I was mainly just reverting that. I also remember that discussion, it must have made some impression in my memory. --Khajidha 18:13, 8 August 2010 (EDT)

There was a bunch of discussion about it here. --abates 20:49, 8 August 2010 (EDT)

Probably location articles, which aren't spit by continuity, are different than characters. - Starfield 21:04, 8 August 2010 (EDT)