User talk:Kirby-Force
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
{{#if: PrimeVandalized.png |
{{#if: ||}}
|}} If you haven't yet contributed anything, we'd really rather you didn't simply change jokes or add new ones without adding actual content. This also holds true for removing captions whole-hog or replacing them with "information" that really isn't. |
{{#ifeq: User talk||}}{{#ifeq: User talk|File|}}
We like 'em fine where they are, good sir.--RosicrucianTalk 23:52, 11 December 2010 (EST)
Hello again
[edit]Stop moving stuff around on a whim. You'll be blocked as soon as a sysop turns up anyway. Jalaguy (talk) 19:29, 18 June 2014 (EDT)
- What did I do wrong exactly? Also, what's a sysop? Kirby-Force (talk) 00:34, 19 June 2014
- Well for a start, you're ban evading, even if this is a four-year-old account. But even if you weren't, moving articles around like without discussing it is a bad idea. And users with sysops have the ability to ban other users. Jalaguy (talk) 19:38, 18 June 2014 (EDT)
- Look. I may have made some mistakes in the past, but I promise from now on to not keep replacing any image files unnecessarily again. I've even been helping out by posting some new photos, but then I go and get banned again anyway just because of what I did on one of my previous accounts, and I'm still not forgiven. I'm just trying to help out, that's all, but from now on, I'll only be posting new photos instead of replacing old ones, even though it still doesn't makew sense as to why you prefer user taken images over official stock photos. Can't you at least give me another chance? Kirby-Force (talk) 00:48, 19 June 2014
- If an account gets banned that means they don't want the person behind the account to keep editing. There is no reason to epect anyone to allow you bak so easily even if it's not the same account. Item42 (talk) 20:12, 18 June 2014 (EDT)
- Kirby Force, you've already had multiple chances and every time displayed a lack of respect for the community on this site. I hope you understand that when you've repeatedly done things that you've been asked not to, we can no longer trust that you're not going to do so again. --abates (talk) 21:21, 18 June 2014 (EDT)
- And we find it ridiculous that you still don't understand our preference for user-taken photos despite the fact the we explained it clearly before. The policy page was even updated to reflect our stance:As this wiki strives to detail what the toys actually look like, fan-taken photos are allowed, and in fact have generally become preferable. Ideally, we would prefer photographs you take yourself of the toy, as you can release the copyright into the public domain.{{#if:|{{{quote2}}}}}{{#if:Transformers Wiki:Images|Transformers Wiki:Images{{#if:|, {{{3}}}|}}|}}
...And I certainly did not appreciate being called out and harassed for following rules and contributing.
(There, I acknowledged it. Happy now?) --Inkblot (talk) 12:09, 19 June 2014 (EDT)
- And we find it ridiculous that you still don't understand our preference for user-taken photos despite the fact the we explained it clearly before. The policy page was even updated to reflect our stance:
- Look. I may have made some mistakes in the past, but I promise from now on to not keep replacing any image files unnecessarily again. I've even been helping out by posting some new photos, but then I go and get banned again anyway just because of what I did on one of my previous accounts, and I'm still not forgiven. I'm just trying to help out, that's all, but from now on, I'll only be posting new photos instead of replacing old ones, even though it still doesn't makew sense as to why you prefer user taken images over official stock photos. Can't you at least give me another chance? Kirby-Force (talk) 00:48, 19 June 2014
- Well for a start, you're ban evading, even if this is a four-year-old account. But even if you weren't, moving articles around like without discussing it is a bad idea. And users with sysops have the ability to ban other users. Jalaguy (talk) 19:38, 18 June 2014 (EDT)
