User talk:LordGalvatronYT/Sandbox/Exarchon

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

I'm very against adding this to the page, especially if you're going to bloat it up with every toy of a character because the comic design doesn't match up with any toy. Saix (talk) 22:36, 15 January 2024 (EST)

This also feels wrong because Exarchon isn't those bodies, he's just inhabiting/animating corpses. AND, we've had loads of mind-swap/possessions etc in TF fiction over the decades, really feels like a bad idea to set a precedent for cluttering (oftentimes already-huge) toy listings with characters who've undergone that kind of thing with every remotely-applicable toy (don't even want to think about how bad that'd be for Rescue Bots). --M Sipher (talk) 22:58, 15 January 2024 (EST)
I am only including very specific character toys he possessed (Like Seige Megatron) or those who does have toys but not like have a ton. (Ruckus and Desthsuarus). Most of the characters he seem to possess are original designs or those who don't have toys here so-. I can always only do his bodies on very specific toys if you feel like that is too much (Like remove characters that he possessed that aren’t based on specific toy designs that are Ruckus and Deathsuaurs here) LordGalvatronYT (talk)
That doesn't address the issues raised. Are we going to put every toy of Cyclonus and Waspinator's original bodies on G1 Starscream's toy page? Tankor has Rhinox's spark, should all Tankor toys ever go on Rhinox's page and vice-versa? I don't see the utility of this. At most I could see a bullet-point list of characters he possessed, but even that is honestly such a short list I don't think it's really justified. --M Sipher (talk) 02:54, 16 January 2024 (EST)
Though Starscream didn’t take up multiple bodies at once or perminately made them HIS bodies (With exception of Waspscream in a Ask Vector Prime story) though a bullet list doesn’t sound like a bad idea here LordGalvatronYT (talk)
No. --M Sipher (talk) 21:20, 16 January 2024 (EST)
Oh then just bullets then? LordGalvatronYT (talk)
No. That'd pointlessly bloat page(s) more. --Lonegamer78 (talk) 23:41, 16 January 2024 (EST)
I checked his victims and the list is shorter so no it wouldn't bloat up the page unless you mean their toys? Though if it isn't good enough feel free to delete the Sandbox. LordGalvatronYT (talk) 06:38, 17 January 2024 (EST)
There really isn't a good reason for this to happen. If the list of victims is that small, then there's not a need to itemize them at all. It's just re-treading information already on the page. --M Sipher (talk) 21:38, 21 January 2024 (EST)