File talk:E21 energonstar.gif: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Rosicrucian (talk | contribs) New page: It's... well, it's a bit hefty on the loadtime, no?--~~~~ |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's... well, it's a bit hefty on the loadtime, no?--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC) | It's... well, it's a bit hefty on the loadtime, no?--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Only 50kb more than the limit for still images. I mean- I don't disagree... I guess the question is whether it's worth the tradeoff for the pretty. You could get a still for 50kb, a quarter of that. (And how much consideration youw ant to have for the ever-shrinking base of modem users, I suppose.) | |||
:I got the Spark animation down to 50KB, but this seems to loose any meaningful detail when you drop that much size. | |||
:Hh. Maybe I'll try dropping a few frames... if I can slim it by a good chunk it'd be worth retaining. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 16:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Hmm. I do see you've pared the colors down to the bare minimum, which often helps. Probably just the number of frames that's doing it.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 16:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Colors, plus masking to control where dithering occurs. (The white background is also to reduce file size.) | |||
:::Dropping every other frame and then ''manually'' eliminating colors one by one seem to have been the magic combination- it cut 60% off the file size to a fairly respectable 108kb. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 16:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:02, 24 March 2009
It's... well, it's a bit hefty on the loadtime, no?--RosicrucianTalk 15:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Only 50kb more than the limit for still images. I mean- I don't disagree... I guess the question is whether it's worth the tradeoff for the pretty. You could get a still for 50kb, a quarter of that. (And how much consideration youw ant to have for the ever-shrinking base of modem users, I suppose.)
- I got the Spark animation down to 50KB, but this seems to loose any meaningful detail when you drop that much size.
- Hh. Maybe I'll try dropping a few frames... if I can slim it by a good chunk it'd be worth retaining. -Derik 16:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm. I do see you've pared the colors down to the bare minimum, which often helps. Probably just the number of frames that's doing it.--RosicrucianTalk 16:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Colors, plus masking to control where dithering occurs. (The white background is also to reduce file size.)
- Dropping every other frame and then manually eliminating colors one by one seem to have been the magic combination- it cut 60% off the file size to a fairly respectable 108kb. -Derik 16:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm. I do see you've pared the colors down to the bare minimum, which often helps. Probably just the number of frames that's doing it.--RosicrucianTalk 16:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
