Talk:Runamuck (disambiguation): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::The two names get transposed a lot... (And got swapped on the Alternator.) There's a certain elegance in having one disambig for 'em... but I'm not sure I'm sold on the idea. (I'm not sure I ''care''.) -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 07:12, 25 August 2009 (EDT) | ::The two names get transposed a lot... (And got swapped on the Alternator.) There's a certain elegance in having one disambig for 'em... but I'm not sure I'm sold on the idea. (I'm not sure I ''care''.) -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 07:12, 25 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::Uh, neither Runamuck nor Runabout was an Alterantor. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 14:46, 25 August 2009 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:46, 25 August 2009
Please, please, pretty please, kill me.
There is exactly TWO characters named Runamuck. We don't need a disambiguation page until there's THREE characters named Runamuck.
Could someone please delete this? ---Blackout- 14:47, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
- I see two Runamucks and a Runabout. Seems worth having to me.
- And is all the self-flagellating drama really called for? -- Repowers 14:58, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
- The two names get transposed a lot... (And got swapped on the Alternator.) There's a certain elegance in having one disambig for 'em... but I'm not sure I'm sold on the idea. (I'm not sure I care.) -Derik 07:12, 25 August 2009 (EDT)
- Uh, neither Runamuck nor Runabout was an Alterantor. --KilMichaelMcC 14:46, 25 August 2009 (EDT)
- The two names get transposed a lot... (And got swapped on the Alternator.) There's a certain elegance in having one disambig for 'em... but I'm not sure I'm sold on the idea. (I'm not sure I care.) -Derik 07:12, 25 August 2009 (EDT)
