Talk:Brisko: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 moved page Talk:Brisko to Talk:Brisko (G1): Disambiguate for G1 Nebulan and IDW G1 Cybertronian. |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==IDW Brisko== | ==IDW Brisko== | ||
Is IDW Brisko not a separate character in the same way | Is IDW Brisko not a separate character in the same way Zetca (G1) is? They're both G1 so we'd need another disamig like "Nebulan" and "Decepticon" maybe. --[[User:Emvee|Emvee]] ([[User talk:Emvee|talk]]) 08:59, 10 February 2015 (EST) | ||
:I agree. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|talk]]) 14:10, 25 May 2015 (EDT) | :I agree. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|talk]]) 14:10, 25 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
::Wait, whoa, I am not convinced - neither about these splits, nor with Zetca being separate, either. What's the benefit, for starters? -- [[User:Repowers|Repowers]] ([[User talk:Repowers|talk]]) 21:50, 27 May 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::See [[Talk:Zetca]]. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|talk]]) 22:52, 27 May 2015 (EDT) | |||
::::Yeah, I never agreed with that in the first place; creating an imaginary distinction in the character just cause they're a different species is another one of those "over-complicating" things-especially when in canon Nebulans have been fully mechanical before. [[User:Escargon|Escargon]] ([[User talk:Escargon|talk]]) 23:01, 27 May 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::::Seconded. I think we're over thinking this. Someone with the same name and visuals be split up because of species.--[[User:Jimsorenson|Jimsorenson]] ([[User talk:Jimsorenson|talk]]) 23:04, 27 May 2015 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:54, 15 July 2015
IDW Brisko
[edit]Is IDW Brisko not a separate character in the same way Zetca (G1) is? They're both G1 so we'd need another disamig like "Nebulan" and "Decepticon" maybe. --Emvee (talk) 08:59, 10 February 2015 (EST)
- I agree. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 14:10, 25 May 2015 (EDT)
- Wait, whoa, I am not convinced - neither about these splits, nor with Zetca being separate, either. What's the benefit, for starters? -- Repowers (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- See Talk:Zetca. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 22:52, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- Yeah, I never agreed with that in the first place; creating an imaginary distinction in the character just cause they're a different species is another one of those "over-complicating" things-especially when in canon Nebulans have been fully mechanical before. Escargon (talk) 23:01, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- Seconded. I think we're over thinking this. Someone with the same name and visuals be split up because of species.--Jimsorenson (talk) 23:04, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- Yeah, I never agreed with that in the first place; creating an imaginary distinction in the character just cause they're a different species is another one of those "over-complicating" things-especially when in canon Nebulans have been fully mechanical before. Escargon (talk) 23:01, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- See Talk:Zetca. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 22:52, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
- Wait, whoa, I am not convinced - neither about these splits, nor with Zetca being separate, either. What's the benefit, for starters? -- Repowers (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2015 (EDT)
