Talk:Decepticon detector: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
New page: Since Jackpot has never heard of it- in 'The Purloined Letter,' Hercule Poirot recovered the stolen merchandise by claiming he has already done so, and then watching when the thief looked... |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since Jackpot has never heard of it- in 'The Purloined Letter,' Hercule Poirot recovered the stolen merchandise by claiming he has already done so, and then watching when the thief looked to check they were still there. The operative principle of causing guilty parties to betray themselves by claiming to have already discovered them is virtually identical. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 06:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | Since Jackpot has never heard of it- in 'The Purloined Letter,' Hercule Poirot recovered the stolen merchandise by claiming he has already done so, and then watching when the thief looked to check they were still there. The operative principle of causing guilty parties to betray themselves by claiming to have already discovered them is virtually identical. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 06:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Heh. Okay, I get it now. I like mine just enough not to change it back, but if somebody else thinks the Poirot ref is better and reverts it, then that's cool. - [[User:Jackpot|Jackpot]] 04:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | |||
Revision as of 04:28, 8 June 2007
Since Jackpot has never heard of it- in 'The Purloined Letter,' Hercule Poirot recovered the stolen merchandise by claiming he has already done so, and then watching when the thief looked to check they were still there. The operative principle of causing guilty parties to betray themselves by claiming to have already discovered them is virtually identical. -Derik 06:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Heh. Okay, I get it now. I like mine just enough not to change it back, but if somebody else thinks the Poirot ref is better and reverts it, then that's cool. - Jackpot 04:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
