Talk:Prowl 2

Jesus, another Prowl?

Reading through this, it's plain that most everyone but Derik is uncomfortable with Prowl 2 being declared one and the same with Prowl II. However, nobody was saying that Prowl 2 was definitively RID Prowl either. Given that the controversy exists at all - and that we have separate Spy Changer Mirage and Mirage GT articles - I think it's dishonest of us to lump Prowl 2 in with RID Prowl as though there was any more proof for that assumption. So that's why I wrote this new article. - Jackpot 03:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

"However, nobody was saying that Prowl 2 was definitively RID Prowl either." Walky was. I'd give a six triliters of energon to see the look on his face when he gets back from BotCon and sees that Prowl 2 is back . . . JW 03:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Lord High Dammit the third, I knew there was going to be an insurmountable pile of terrible crap I'd have to go through after I got back, but didn't expect it from JACKPOT. God dammit. That's it, I quit the wiki. --ItsWalky 03:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry dude, but seriously. Delaring Derik wrong doesn't mean taking the polar opposite side. - Jackpot 03:23, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

There IS circumstantial proof for that assumption, which is that Side Burn and X-Brawn's "Super" redecoes were internally referred to as "Side Burn 2" and "X-Brawn 2" (I don't seem to have any evidence that this was actually the case for Prowl, though I can't imagine it wouldn't be) and that the Spy Changer's deco is a blue/white/blue layout more or less matching the Deluxe redeco's. To me personally it seems ludicrous to think that anyone could have intended this to be anything BUT the same character - in fact, I'd sooner see Mirage GT folded into Mirage's page than have its existence use to support keeping this separated from Prowl's actual page.

But that's just me. (And god damn it I just want to be allowed to edit this Talk page!) -LV 03:26, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

From Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki, a Wikia wiki.