MediaWiki talk:Copyleft: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
→Toy photos: new section |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::So I do. Had troubles with the word myself. Thanks. --[[User:Sntint|Sntint]] 16:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | :::So I do. Had troubles with the word myself. Thanks. --[[User:Sntint|Sntint]] 16:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Toy photos == | |||
I asked this on various boards before... but ar we sure that toy photos are solely copyrighted to the photographer? Don't they fall under "two-dimensional replications of copyrighted three-dimensional designs" or somesuch, an thus are derivate works of Hasbro-owned designs?--[[User:Nevermore|Nevermore]] 11:21, 15 August 2010 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:21, 15 August 2010
"liscenting"? --Sntint 08:20, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
"license" is my Kryptonite. It's a word I mispell in different ways every time I try it. That and "occur".—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Derik (talk • contribs).
- So... you mean "licencing"? --Sntint 08:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- No, he means "licensing". Note how the other spellings are underlined in red in the Edit window by the wiki's auto-spellchecker.--Apcog 15:37, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- The wiki doesn't have a spell checker. That's the greatness of Firefox 2.0 you're seeing. --FortMax 16:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- So I do. Had troubles with the word myself. Thanks. --Sntint 16:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Toy photos
[edit]I asked this on various boards before... but ar we sure that toy photos are solely copyrighted to the photographer? Don't they fall under "two-dimensional replications of copyrighted three-dimensional designs" or somesuch, an thus are derivate works of Hasbro-owned designs?--Nevermore 11:21, 15 August 2010 (EDT)
