Talk:Authorial intent: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m Talk:Author intent moved to Talk:Authorial intent: It's either "Authorial intent" or "Author's intent", not "Author intent". I prefer the first. |
→Author intent.: new section |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:::::How do we handle that? *looks* Yeah, that's about right. Could stand to be more enthusiastic (or at least informative) about the subject... Thanks Walky! | :::::How do we handle that? *looks* Yeah, that's about right. Could stand to be more enthusiastic (or at least informative) about the subject... Thanks Walky! | ||
:::::(So I take it I'm completely misremembering Torca being named Deathblow his original color scheme? Does anyone have a scan of those promo material for a trivia note about the color scheme on Torca page then? I have the Torca toy- I can photograph that for his toys section...) -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 20:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC) | :::::(So I take it I'm completely misremembering Torca being named Deathblow his original color scheme? Does anyone have a scan of those promo material for a trivia note about the color scheme on Torca page then? I have the Torca toy- I can photograph that for his toys section...) -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 20:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Author intent. == | |||
Authorial? I think you just made that word up. <small>(kidding!)</small> Its not like it is a sentence. "Author intent" is like a compound word. Maybe "author-intent" would be more technically correct. - [[User:Starfield|Starfield]] 18:53, 4 May 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 22:53, 4 May 2009
That second-to-last paragraph seems a little funny. --74.41.68.106 19:10, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Man, I'm gonna HAVE to add something about the Star Drive/Nemesis thing. Because hooboy, the ridiculous. -hx 20:28, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- Aheh. Hm. Should probably note TFU Longhorn... --M Sipher 19:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Whot abooot 'im? (I'm blanking.) -Derik 19:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- According to author intent (Dan Khanna), he's a new form for Ramulus. --ItsWalky 20:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Whot abooot 'im? (I'm blanking.) -Derik 19:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oh hey, nice to know! He's a cipher, so I suppose that author intent informs our read of this blank area of continuity.
- How do we handle that? *looks* Yeah, that's about right. Could stand to be more enthusiastic (or at least informative) about the subject... Thanks Walky!
- (So I take it I'm completely misremembering Torca being named Deathblow his original color scheme? Does anyone have a scan of those promo material for a trivia note about the color scheme on Torca page then? I have the Torca toy- I can photograph that for his toys section...) -Derik 20:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Author intent.
Authorial? I think you just made that word up. (kidding!) Its not like it is a sentence. "Author intent" is like a compound word. Maybe "author-intent" would be more technically correct. - Starfield 18:53, 4 May 2009 (EDT)
