Talk:Multi-component Transformer: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m Talk:Trans-locational Transformers moved to Talk:Multilocational Transformers: I think that is a better word |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I realize everything about this article is questionable: the title, the definition, the list of things that should be included, and even whether the article should exist or not. But it seems like a valid concept to Transformerdom, even if it has been vaguely defined. I thought I'd give it a first draft knowing it might need major revisions. (Starfield logged out) - [[Special:Contributions/69.14.126.15|69.14.126.15]] 23:44, 2 June 2009 (EDT) | I realize everything about this article is questionable: the title, the definition, the list of things that should be included, and even whether the article should exist or not. But it seems like a valid concept to Transformerdom, even if it has been vaguely defined. I thought I'd give it a first draft knowing it might need major revisions. (Starfield logged out) - [[Special:Contributions/69.14.126.15|69.14.126.15]] 23:44, 2 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
:It's not a bad topic to cover, if only to examine how incredibly ''little'' has been done with the concept in fiction, despite its recurrence over the years. I think "Multi-component Transformers" might be a bit less awkward as a title. -- [[User:Repowers|Repowers]] 12:36, 3 June 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:36, 3 June 2009
I realize everything about this article is questionable: the title, the definition, the list of things that should be included, and even whether the article should exist or not. But it seems like a valid concept to Transformerdom, even if it has been vaguely defined. I thought I'd give it a first draft knowing it might need major revisions. (Starfield logged out) - 69.14.126.15 23:44, 2 June 2009 (EDT)
- It's not a bad topic to cover, if only to examine how incredibly little has been done with the concept in fiction, despite its recurrence over the years. I think "Multi-component Transformers" might be a bit less awkward as a title. -- Repowers 12:36, 3 June 2009 (EDT)
