Talk:Combatron (planet): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
New page: We don't have "Junkion (species)" and "Junkion (G1)", we have "Junkion (planet)." Why is this planet being disambig'd with "Cybertron"? That kind of treatment makes sense for characters,... |
Rosicrucian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Why is this planet being disambig'd with "Cybertron"? That kind of treatment makes sense for characters, but Planets ''routinely'' show up in multiple continuity families, and we ''don't'' normally break up their articles. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 21:29, 5 June 2009 (EDT) | Why is this planet being disambig'd with "Cybertron"? That kind of treatment makes sense for characters, but Planets ''routinely'' show up in multiple continuity families, and we ''don't'' normally break up their articles. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 21:29, 5 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
Interrobang, I'm aware that there are multiple articles using (Cybertron) as their parenthetical. However, are those articles ''regarding planets''? --[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 22:01, 5 June 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 02:01, 6 June 2009
We don't have "Junkion (species)" and "Junkion (G1)", we have "Junkion (planet)."
Why is this planet being disambig'd with "Cybertron"? That kind of treatment makes sense for characters, but Planets routinely show up in multiple continuity families, and we don't normally break up their articles. -Derik 21:29, 5 June 2009 (EDT)
Interrobang, I'm aware that there are multiple articles using (Cybertron) as their parenthetical. However, are those articles regarding planets? --RosicrucianTalk 22:01, 5 June 2009 (EDT)
