Talk:Constructicon (ROTF): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==TTK== | ==TTK== | ||
Is there any confirmation that Trample, Tread and Kickback are constructicons? [[User:Eire]] 15.15 July 20 2009 (UTC) | Is there any confirmation that Trample, Tread and Kickback are constructicons? [[User:Eire]] 15.15 July 20 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Not explicitly. They ''could'' simply be Decepticons who took on construction-vehicle alternate modes when they came to Earth with the goal of bringing Megatron back to life. If they are not Constructicons, who is a Constructicon? | |||
:Seriously, it is a question that is bugging me a little. Who ''is'' explicitly named a Constructicon? Devastator is, in the toyline. The individual transformable toys aren't as far as I know. Is Devastator the only "Constructicon." Are the Devastator components Constructicons but not the duplicates running around? Is anyone with a construction vehicle alternate mode a Constructicon? This could use a little more documentation. - [[User:Starfield|Starfield]] 10:50, 20 July 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:50, 20 July 2009
Naming conventions
Aarrgghh. I wished I paid more attention to these guys' names BEFORE I saw the film. I'm not putting any spoilers in here, but this page will need an ACCURATE revision. If any editor is reading this, please try to track the Cosntructicons in the Movie, and how many there are. I'll not see the film again before its US release. There may be an arguement for putting ALL the contruction vehicle Decepticons in here Drmick 09:56, 21 June 2009 (EDT)
Army builders?
Well, i noticed that some constructicons appeared in three different locations at once sometimes, so i've gotten the idea that allot of them just share the same body frame, and are therefore great army builders. Anyone agrees?--Sunjumper 10:48, 24 June 2009 (EDT)
- Well, they also share the same name, at least Rampage does. "Rampage" is a Devastator component (as shown in the toys and DK guidebook) and Rampage is the guy running around after Devastator is formed (as revealed in the film). - Starfield 10:53, 24 June 2009 (EDT)
Reorganization
I move that this page be re-organized by "model," and we just mark the ones that form Devastator with a †.
It's the only way we're gonna make any headway in triaging the movie 'cons. -Derik 18:18, 25 June 2009 (EDT)
- Didn't Overload form Devastator in the film? Shouldn't Scavenger be "orthodox"? - Starfield 23:08, 25 June 2009 (EDT)
- Overload was part of the group of Constructicons who formed Devastator in the movies. SteamFan42 01:58, 26 June 2009 (EDT)
- The constructicons issue needs addressed, both here and mentioned somewhere on the movie and toyline page. Don't we have two Rampages? The one that fought Bumblebee and the Devastator one? Can't we design a nomenclature system for them all? At least until it is addressed officially. Drmick 13:27, 1 July 2009 (EDT)
- Overload was part of the group of Constructicons who formed Devastator in the movies. SteamFan42 01:58, 26 June 2009 (EDT)
TTK
Is there any confirmation that Trample, Tread and Kickback are constructicons? User:Eire 15.15 July 20 2009 (UTC)
- Not explicitly. They could simply be Decepticons who took on construction-vehicle alternate modes when they came to Earth with the goal of bringing Megatron back to life. If they are not Constructicons, who is a Constructicon?
- Seriously, it is a question that is bugging me a little. Who is explicitly named a Constructicon? Devastator is, in the toyline. The individual transformable toys aren't as far as I know. Is Devastator the only "Constructicon." Are the Devastator components Constructicons but not the duplicates running around? Is anyone with a construction vehicle alternate mode a Constructicon? This could use a little more documentation. - Starfield 10:50, 20 July 2009 (EDT)
