Talk:Perceptor (G1): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
→Magnification: new section |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I really think that bio was just referring to Perceptor's resistance cell as seen in the Marvel Comics. Do we really need a separate fiction section for this? --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 01:22, 19 October 2009 (EDT) | I really think that bio was just referring to Perceptor's resistance cell as seen in the Marvel Comics. Do we really need a separate fiction section for this? --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 01:22, 19 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
:No.... --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 01:37, 19 October 2009 (EDT) | :No.... --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 01:37, 19 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Magnification == | |||
I know the old catalogs listed him as having a magnification of 1x, but surely that isn't right. A magnification of 1x is what you get with the NAKED EYE, things look 1x the size they really are. That is, no magnification at all. [[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] 14:04, 10 December 2009 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 19:04, 10 December 2009
REWRITE IT ALL IN PERCEPTOR SPEAK!
...please?
- I did what I could with the Animated Continuity section, but the whole article could still use a significant amount of work. - Dark T Zeratul 05:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
AHM 15
- Now that part of it was used on the cover, should we protect the main part of the article? Might be a dumb idea, but it would be neat to have the main section forever inprinted and reflected on the cover.--Sunjumper 11:56, 29 September 2009 (EDT)
Universe Classic series toy bios
I really think that bio was just referring to Perceptor's resistance cell as seen in the Marvel Comics. Do we really need a separate fiction section for this? --ItsWalky 01:22, 19 October 2009 (EDT)
- No.... --Detour 01:37, 19 October 2009 (EDT)
Magnification
I know the old catalogs listed him as having a magnification of 1x, but surely that isn't right. A magnification of 1x is what you get with the NAKED EYE, things look 1x the size they really are. That is, no magnification at all. Khajidha 14:04, 10 December 2009 (EST)

