Talk:Demolishor (WFC): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Rosicrucian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Geewunling (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Depends on what WFC turns out to be, I'd say. We use (G1) to disamb guys who appeared in later G1 comics rather than (Dreamwve), (War Within) etc.. Right now, I don't see how a different medium would mean another identifier. [[User:Geewunling|Geewunling]] 02:27, 7 April 2010 (EDT) | ::Depends on what WFC turns out to be, I'd say. We use (G1) to disamb guys who appeared in later G1 comics rather than (Dreamwve), (War Within) etc.. Right now, I don't see how a different medium would mean another identifier. [[User:Geewunling|Geewunling]] 02:27, 7 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
:::Except there's the distinct possibility that WFC is considered the backstory to Prime (which has been danced around a few times by Hasbro). I'd say err on the side of caution here. We don't know that this Demolishor is being retroactively inserted into G1. We know that WFC is G1-''esque'', but we do not know that it's considered G1.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 02:31, 7 April 2010 (EDT) | :::Except there's the distinct possibility that WFC is considered the backstory to Prime (which has been danced around a few times by Hasbro). I'd say err on the side of caution here. We don't know that this Demolishor is being retroactively inserted into G1. We know that WFC is G1-''esque'', but we do not know that it's considered G1.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 02:31, 7 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
::::I'd appreciate it not to be reminded of that horrendous new franchise name. For gods, it's even worse than "Animated". Anyway, point. For the sake of clarity until further notice, I agree this one should be moved to WFC, with the notion it ought to be changed back if it turns out anyway that WFC is part of G1. [[User:Geewunling|Geewunling]] 06:51, 7 April 2010 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:51, 7 April 2010
Parenthetical
Since we're being anal about where characters originate, wouldn't this more rightly be "Demolishor (WFC)"?--RosicrucianTalk 01:42, 7 April 2010 (EDT)
- I've been thinking about pointing this out myself, but I'm just so unsure just what the rule actually is for this stuff... --Detour 02:23, 7 April 2010 (EDT)
- Depends on what WFC turns out to be, I'd say. We use (G1) to disamb guys who appeared in later G1 comics rather than (Dreamwve), (War Within) etc.. Right now, I don't see how a different medium would mean another identifier. Geewunling 02:27, 7 April 2010 (EDT)
- Except there's the distinct possibility that WFC is considered the backstory to Prime (which has been danced around a few times by Hasbro). I'd say err on the side of caution here. We don't know that this Demolishor is being retroactively inserted into G1. We know that WFC is G1-esque, but we do not know that it's considered G1.--RosicrucianTalk 02:31, 7 April 2010 (EDT)
- I'd appreciate it not to be reminded of that horrendous new franchise name. For gods, it's even worse than "Animated". Anyway, point. For the sake of clarity until further notice, I agree this one should be moved to WFC, with the notion it ought to be changed back if it turns out anyway that WFC is part of G1. Geewunling 06:51, 7 April 2010 (EDT)
- Except there's the distinct possibility that WFC is considered the backstory to Prime (which has been danced around a few times by Hasbro). I'd say err on the side of caution here. We don't know that this Demolishor is being retroactively inserted into G1. We know that WFC is G1-esque, but we do not know that it's considered G1.--RosicrucianTalk 02:31, 7 April 2010 (EDT)
- Depends on what WFC turns out to be, I'd say. We use (G1) to disamb guys who appeared in later G1 comics rather than (Dreamwve), (War Within) etc.. Right now, I don't see how a different medium would mean another identifier. Geewunling 02:27, 7 April 2010 (EDT)
