Talk:Brisko: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 moved page Talk:Brisko to Talk:Brisko (G1): Disambiguate for G1 Nebulan and IDW G1 Cybertronian. |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Is IDW Brisko not a separate character in the same way [[Zetca (G1)|Zetca]] is? They're both G1 so we'd need another disamig like "Nebulan" and "Decepticon" maybe. --[[User:Emvee|Emvee]] ([[User talk:Emvee|talk]]) 08:59, 10 February 2015 (EST) | Is IDW Brisko not a separate character in the same way [[Zetca (G1)|Zetca]] is? They're both G1 so we'd need another disamig like "Nebulan" and "Decepticon" maybe. --[[User:Emvee|Emvee]] ([[User talk:Emvee|talk]]) 08:59, 10 February 2015 (EST) | ||
:I agree. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|talk]]) 14:10, 25 May 2015 (EDT) | :I agree. [[User:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47]] ([[User talk:S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47|talk]]) 14:10, 25 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
::Wait, whoa, I am not convinced - neither about these splits, nor with Zetca being separate, either. What's the benefit, for starters? -- [[User:Repowers|Repowers]] ([[User talk:Repowers|talk]]) 21:50, 27 May 2015 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 01:50, 28 May 2015
IDW Brisko
Is IDW Brisko not a separate character in the same way Zetca is? They're both G1 so we'd need another disamig like "Nebulan" and "Decepticon" maybe. --Emvee (talk) 08:59, 10 February 2015 (EST)
- I agree. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 14:10, 25 May 2015 (EDT)
