Talk:List of computers: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Steve-o (talk | contribs)
m Talk:Computers moved to Talk:List of computers: List pages should generally be called "List of..."
Innocent!
Line 8: Line 8:




(G.B. Blackrock: 2006/03/10 - 4:32 pm PST)  In the absence of other sources (like, did the name ever appear on-screen?), I'm happy to go with this.  However, it should be noted that few series "bibles" are considered canon very far into a series.  They just tell writers how to get started, most of the time.  [[User:G.B. Blackrock]]<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>
(G.B. Blackrock: 2006/03/10 - 4:32 pm PST)  In the absence of other sources (like, did the name ever appear on-screen?), I'm happy to go with this.  However, it should be noted that few series "bibles" are considered canon very far into a series.  They just tell writers how to get started, most of the time.  [[User:G.B. Blackrock]]
 
== Innocent! ==
 
Seriously, why do we need this? It's against the style manual, it doesn't link to even half of the computers that have articles, and it's redundant when considering [[:Category:Computers]].--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]] 16:45, 2 September 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div>

Revision as of 16:45, 2 September 2007

(G.B. Blackrock: 2006/03/10 - 4:11 pm PST) Shouldn't "Teletraan" be spelled "Teletran"? (not just assuming that the title of the Wiki gets it right) User:G.B. Blackrock

The spelling used in the Transformers Writers Bible has two "A"s http://transformers.winterchill.com/bible/biblepage3.html -Bobby

The original scripts and the series bible refer to it as 'Teletraan'.


(G.B. Blackrock: 2006/03/10 - 4:32 pm PST) In the absence of other sources (like, did the name ever appear on-screen?), I'm happy to go with this. However, it should be noted that few series "bibles" are considered canon very far into a series. They just tell writers how to get started, most of the time. User:G.B. Blackrock

Innocent!

Seriously, why do we need this? It's against the style manual, it doesn't link to even half of the computers that have articles, and it's redundant when considering Category:Computers.--Rosicrucian 16:45, 2 September 2007 (UTC)