Talk:Sub-Commander's Day: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
New page: ''Mini-Mayhem'' comics are canon? Sure, they pass the cardinal rule of "approved by Hasbro and/or Takara," but doesn't the strip's tongue-in-cheek nature select itself out? Like... I don... |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''Mini-Mayhem'' comics are canon? Sure, they pass the cardinal rule of "approved by Hasbro and/or Takara," but doesn't the strip's tongue-in-cheek nature select itself out? Like... I don't think [[Visitations]] would've been canon without [[Omega Point]] having incorporated it as backstory, and even then we tread lightly regarding which parts are "true." | ''Mini-Mayhem'' comics are canon? Sure, they pass the cardinal rule of "approved by Hasbro and/or Takara," but doesn't the strip's tongue-in-cheek nature select itself out? Like... I don't think [[Visitations]] would've been canon without [[Omega Point]] having incorporated it as backstory, and even then we tread lightly regarding which parts are "true." | ||
Admittedly, I can't think of a hard-and-fast rule to determine whether any given story is too comedic to be "real." But as a matter of taste, I don't think ''Mini-Mayhem'' should be included here. Or, at the very least, we shouldn't [[Sub-Commander|mix references to it with the rest of the multiverse]]. - [[User:Jackpot|Jackpot]] 02:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | Admittedly, I can't think of a hard-and-fast rule to determine whether any given story is too comedic to be "real." But as a matter of taste, I don't think ''Mini-Mayhem'' should be included here. Or, at the very least, we shouldn't [[Sub-Commander|mix references to it with the rest of the multiverse]]. - [[User:Jackpot|Jackpot]] 02:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
:If [[The Beast Within]] is canon, the mini-mayhems are canon. | |||
:(Though we seem to be documenting the events of the latter only when they add to the universe / are exceptionally hilarious. ) | |||
:I happen to think knowing that The Fallen once shot down a ship full of bumble-puppies is a siginifigant addition to his otherwise unexplored backstory. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 02:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | |||
Revision as of 02:59, 8 August 2007
Mini-Mayhem comics are canon? Sure, they pass the cardinal rule of "approved by Hasbro and/or Takara," but doesn't the strip's tongue-in-cheek nature select itself out? Like... I don't think Visitations would've been canon without Omega Point having incorporated it as backstory, and even then we tread lightly regarding which parts are "true."
Admittedly, I can't think of a hard-and-fast rule to determine whether any given story is too comedic to be "real." But as a matter of taste, I don't think Mini-Mayhem should be included here. Or, at the very least, we shouldn't mix references to it with the rest of the multiverse. - Jackpot 02:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- If The Beast Within is canon, the mini-mayhems are canon.
- (Though we seem to be documenting the events of the latter only when they add to the universe / are exceptionally hilarious. )
- I happen to think knowing that The Fallen once shot down a ship full of bumble-puppies is a siginifigant addition to his otherwise unexplored backstory. -Derik 02:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
