Talk:Tech Spec: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Moved Derik's response to maintain thread-flow and attributions and so on and so forth |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Also, I heartily encourage fact-checking, especially in the Armada part. I have confidence in everything I wrote, but not much evidence to back it up (especially the Hasbro-misunderstanding rumor). And my knowledge only becomes shakier after that, so I stopped myself for good measure. | Also, I heartily encourage fact-checking, especially in the Armada part. I have confidence in everything I wrote, but not much evidence to back it up (especially the Hasbro-misunderstanding rumor). And my knowledge only becomes shakier after that, so I stopped myself for good measure. | ||
If I had more time, I'd do some more digging with regards to the quirks of G1 Tech-Speckery, like the different categories for the Micromaster teams, or the specific ratings on the Headmaster toys. But I don't, so I invite anybody who's interested to go for it. - [[User:Jackpot|Jackpot]] 18:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
:When in doubt, mark a section with <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> (a request for a supporting citation) indicating you ''think'' this is right, but you're unsure enough that you'd appreciate a concrete example. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 20:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC) | :When in doubt, mark a section with <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> (a request for a supporting citation) indicating you ''think'' this is right, but you're unsure enough that you'd appreciate a concrete example. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 20:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
There were Energon Bio trading cards with some of the toys. | There were Energon Bio trading cards with some of the toys. | ||
Revision as of 20:44, 17 August 2007
On the few packages I could find that had the term (some G1 and MW boxes), it was conspicuously capitalized. So I've used "Tech Specs" when talking about the actual technical-specifications chart, and I've used "tech specs" for the casual definition of the whole bio/art/TS group.
Also, I heartily encourage fact-checking, especially in the Armada part. I have confidence in everything I wrote, but not much evidence to back it up (especially the Hasbro-misunderstanding rumor). And my knowledge only becomes shakier after that, so I stopped myself for good measure.
If I had more time, I'd do some more digging with regards to the quirks of G1 Tech-Speckery, like the different categories for the Micromaster teams, or the specific ratings on the Headmaster toys. But I don't, so I invite anybody who's interested to go for it. - Jackpot 18:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- When in doubt, mark a section with {{fact}} (a request for a supporting citation) indicating you think this is right, but you're unsure enough that you'd appreciate a concrete example. -Derik 20:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
There were Energon Bio trading cards with some of the toys. Oddly, my Jetfire had a tech spec card and a bio card. Just mentioning. --Chiasaur11
- That was actually something that seemed to vary from shipment to shipment. Some had one, some had the other, some had both. I've seen different pack-ins even for the same toy.--Rosicrucian 20:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- I really stopped paying attention to Tech Spec stuff around that time, so if you want to throw Energon info in there, be my guest. Also, I don't know when they started printing 'em on the packaging again, but if anyone else knows, that'd be good to have in there too. - Jackpot 20:42, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
