Talk:Sparking gimmick: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Pirateblue (talk | contribs) →Dino Sparkers: For future reference. |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Let us not forget that it only managed to set the child's hair on fire in combination with frikkin' ''hairspray'', which makes it equivalent to inspecting vats of gasoline while smoking a cigarette. [[User:Takeshi357|Takeshi357]] 16:12, 19 May 2013 (EDT) | ::Let us not forget that it only managed to set the child's hair on fire in combination with frikkin' ''hairspray'', which makes it equivalent to inspecting vats of gasoline while smoking a cigarette. [[User:Takeshi357|Takeshi357]] 16:12, 19 May 2013 (EDT) | ||
It is dangerous | |||
==Barbie Link== | ==Barbie Link== | ||
Revision as of 19:06, 9 February 2024
I would like to see a picture of the damage this gimmick causes to toys. A firecon, by preference. -Derik 19:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oogh. I'd love to oblige, but I don't own any of these...I have seen this damage on non-TF sparking toys, but that doesn't exactly help, I guess. --Autobus Prime 19:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Let us not forget that it only managed to set the child's hair on fire in combination with frikkin' hairspray, which makes it equivalent to inspecting vats of gasoline while smoking a cigarette. Takeshi357 16:12, 19 May 2013 (EDT)
It is dangerous
Barbie Link
i can't get the barbie link to work and tried a search to find a replacement but am unsure what exactly i am looking for, can someone please update it. 86.31.37.127 04:47, 16 June 2009 (EDT)
- Done. -Mazenoise 05:12, 16 June 2009 (EDT)
Dino Sparkers
Do the AOE Dino Sparkers have such a gimmick? What with not having one (plus having no interest in getting any), and the whole Barbie underwear fire thing, I'm utterly confused either way. Pirateblue (talk) 10:44, 21 May 2014 (EDT)

