Talk:More than Meets the Eye (disambiguation): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
m wikia |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
===Restart=== | ===Restart=== | ||
I know that this appears to have stalled in the time sense, but I think we should revist this discussion again. I agree that keeping it here isn't a very good way to distinguish between the the three-parter and the comic, and the three parter more than qualifies in terms of notability. -- [[User:SFH|SFH]] 23:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC) | I know that this appears to have stalled in the time sense, but I think we should revist this discussion again. I agree that keeping it here isn't a very good way to distinguish between the the three-parter and the comic, and the three parter more than qualifies in terms of notability. -- [[User:SFH|SFH]] 23:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:13, 20 March 2009
According to the indicia of issue 1 of this series, the correct capitalization is "More Than Meets The Eye" (with "The" capitalized). The title of this page should reflect that, nu? JW 03:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
disambig
Should "More Than Meets The Eye" be a disambig page? It obviously refers to multiple concepts. --MistaTee 14:37, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- If we have a disambig page, is the contents like something:
- The phrase More Than Meets the Eye may refer to the following:
- More Than Meets The Eye, the famous slogan of the Transformers.
- More Than Meets the Eye, the profile books publish by Dreamwave.
- More Than Meets the Eye, Part 1, the first episode of the three-part animated miniseries followed by part2 and part3
- {{disambig}}
- The phrase More Than Meets the Eye may refer to the following:
- --15:03, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me, with the Dreamwave book as More Than Meets the Eye (comics). --MistaTee 20:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Restart
I know that this appears to have stalled in the time sense, but I think we should revist this discussion again. I agree that keeping it here isn't a very good way to distinguish between the the three-parter and the comic, and the three parter more than qualifies in terms of notability. -- SFH 23:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

