Talk:Full-Barrel: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Deceptitran (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:The [[Combiner]] page specifically says that Micromaster Combiner squads, with their combined altmodes, are a type of combiner. The word was also used on the packaging, I believe. [[User:JW|JW]] 01:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | :The [[Combiner]] page specifically says that Micromaster Combiner squads, with their combined altmodes, are a type of combiner. The word was also used on the packaging, I believe. [[User:JW|JW]] 01:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
::Yep. In fact, the Micromaster Combiners were the very first official use of the term on toy-packaging. (And maybe the first official use ever, though I wouldn't be surprised if it'd shown up in the comic before then.) - [[User:Jackpot|Jackpot]] 06:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | ::Yep. In fact, the Micromaster Combiners were the very first official use of the term on toy-packaging. (And maybe the first official use ever, though I wouldn't be surprised if it'd shown up in the comic before then.) - [[User:Jackpot|Jackpot]] 06:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:31, 24 March 2009
I thought the combiners category was only for robots who can combine into a giant gestalt robot, and was specifically *not* for robots with combined altmodes, or whose only robot mode requires combining
- The Combiner page specifically says that Micromaster Combiner squads, with their combined altmodes, are a type of combiner. The word was also used on the packaging, I believe. JW 01:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yep. In fact, the Micromaster Combiners were the very first official use of the term on toy-packaging. (And maybe the first official use ever, though I wouldn't be surprised if it'd shown up in the comic before then.) - Jackpot 06:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
