Talk:Blank: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I'm ''guessing'' the three parts are assumed to be pod, protoform, and spark.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 14:15, 20 July 2009 (EDT) | :I'm ''guessing'' the three parts are assumed to be pod, protoform, and spark.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 14:15, 20 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Shouldn't programming be included in there too? --[[User:Ascendron|Ascendron]] 14:17, 20 July 2009 (EDT) | ::Shouldn't programming be included in there too? --[[User:Ascendron|Ascendron]] 14:17, 20 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::Yes, I would have thought the components would be protoform, spark and datatrax. But this is Derik at work, so I dunno... - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 16:20, 20 July 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 20:20, 20 July 2009
3-part system
A blank represents 2 parts of the 3-part protoform system
A blank is made of something besides a protoform? What's the other thing? --fleb 13:35, 20 July 2009 (EDT)
- I'm guessing the three parts are assumed to be pod, protoform, and spark.--RosicrucianTalk 14:15, 20 July 2009 (EDT)
- Shouldn't programming be included in there too? --Ascendron 14:17, 20 July 2009 (EDT)
- Yes, I would have thought the components would be protoform, spark and datatrax. But this is Derik at work, so I dunno... - Chris McFeely 16:20, 20 July 2009 (EDT)
- Shouldn't programming be included in there too? --Ascendron 14:17, 20 July 2009 (EDT)
