Talk:Viroid: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
New page: I might be wrong here, but it seemed to me from context that this term would probably apply retroactively to the 2007 movie's invasive computer program as well. -~~~~ |
-Blackout- (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I might be wrong here, but it seemed to me from context that this term would probably apply retroactively to the 2007 movie's invasive computer program as well. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 10:25, 7 July 2009 (EDT) | I might be wrong here, but it seemed to me from context that this term would probably apply retroactively to the 2007 movie's invasive computer program as well. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 10:25, 7 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Possibly yes, but it borders on fanon. We could add a "2007 movie" fiction section and note that the invasive computer program in that movie may have been a viroid. | |||
:But do you know what strikes me about these? | |||
:The Autobots can give the humans a huge cannon, but they can't give them a decent antivirus program. --[[User:-Blackout-|-Blackout-]] 01:41, 2 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 05:41, 2 September 2009
I might be wrong here, but it seemed to me from context that this term would probably apply retroactively to the 2007 movie's invasive computer program as well. -Derik 10:25, 7 July 2009 (EDT)
- Possibly yes, but it borders on fanon. We could add a "2007 movie" fiction section and note that the invasive computer program in that movie may have been a viroid.
- But do you know what strikes me about these?
- The Autobots can give the humans a huge cannon, but they can't give them a decent antivirus program. ---Blackout- 01:41, 2 September 2009 (EDT)
