User talk:Geewunling: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Rosicrucian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
...I will however request that you be a bit less zealous in your flagging of "outdated" talkpages. If it's a talkpage for an article that exists, it ought not get deleted.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 14:42, 7 April 2009 (EDT) | ...I will however request that you be a bit less zealous in your flagging of "outdated" talkpages. If it's a talkpage for an article that exists, it ought not get deleted.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 14:42, 7 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
:To clarify, lest there be a misunderstanding, I am ''absolutely cool'' with 99.95% of the ones you are nominating. Talkpage redirects? Boffo. Talkpages for articles that no longer exist? With you entirely. I only object to deleting talkpages for existing articles.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:09, 7 April 2009 (EDT) | :To clarify, lest there be a misunderstanding, I am ''absolutely cool'' with 99.95% of the ones you are nominating. Talkpage redirects? Boffo. Talkpages for articles that no longer exist? With you entirely. I only object to deleting talkpages for existing articles.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 15:09, 7 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
...are you actually fixing all those links BY HAND when a page moves? -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 06:26, 21 November 2009 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 11:26, 21 November 2009
Yo, could you maybe mark your additions of the delete template to articles as "minor changes"? Because theyre frickin' drowning the recent changes page lately, and a way to not have to see them would be nice. - Chris McFeely 12:54, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
- ...well, once I get to 'em, all you have to do is click "hide patrolled edits."--RosicrucianTalk 13:55, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
- Oh, yeah, I know that, I just mean before they get deleted (I could delete them myself, of course, but... here we are!). --Chris McFeely 13:58, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
...I will however request that you be a bit less zealous in your flagging of "outdated" talkpages. If it's a talkpage for an article that exists, it ought not get deleted.--RosicrucianTalk 14:42, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
- To clarify, lest there be a misunderstanding, I am absolutely cool with 99.95% of the ones you are nominating. Talkpage redirects? Boffo. Talkpages for articles that no longer exist? With you entirely. I only object to deleting talkpages for existing articles.--RosicrucianTalk 15:09, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
...are you actually fixing all those links BY HAND when a page moves? -Derik 06:26, 21 November 2009 (EST)
