User talk:Primal Rage

Eire and Detour's reasoning is sound. The stub template encourages people to contribute to the article which lacks information. By providing a, let's face it, rather short and cursory passage that basically says "The good guys arrive somewhere. Stuff happens and they fight the bad guys. They win, and leave", people are less likely to take the time to complete the article, because people are less inclined to completely rewrite somebody else's work, no matter how little information it conveys. --FFN 05:51, 24 October 2009 (EDT)

No long description exists that I can find, nor even a translation into english. If you have some english translation I will provide a longer description. 68.61.240.172 15:10, 24 October 2009 (EDT)

In that case you *PROBABLY* pad out the synopsis with more detailed descriptions of things happening so you can get at least a few paragraphs, but leave the stub tags around, and perhaps even a ((cleanup|date|insert description here}} saying this synopsis was done without the benefit of translated text. Or doing this may offend our staff and regular users, heh. --FFN 16:55, 24 October 2009 (EDT)

I never removed the stub notice in the first place, I just added a couple sentences of overview, and it got delted. Yet somehow the people deleting it failed to offer anything better. 68.61.240.172 22:17, 24 October 2009 (EDT)

(re: claims on FFN's talk page) You did remove the stub notice, mignash. Check your edit history. --Detour 23:31, 24 October 2009 (EDT)

(You're supposed to keep all talk page replies on the one page so the conversation can be followed on a single page, as opposed to multiple pages on multiple windows/tabs.) --FFN 03:17, 25 October 2009 (EDT)

Thanks! I hadn't seen that left it in this time. 68.61.240.172 12:28, 25 October 2009 (EDT)

Please, stop your edit war on Rook (SG).--Rosicrucian^Talk 17:44, 22 November 2009 (EST)

I agree. Please remove political commentaries. 68.61.240.172 17:46, 22 November 2009 (EST)

Okay, since you seem to be missing the point let me say that if you remove that one more time without getting some other users to support you, I am giving you a time-out. Right now, the majority seem to be in favor of the caption.--Rosicrucian^Talk 17:50, 22 November 2009 (EST)

It seems' It's Walky blocked me ANYWAYS, even if I didn't change it again. His reason for blocking seems to be because I'm me. What's up with that? 68.61.240.172 10:26, 23 November 2009 (EST)

You know, I searched for a Transformers wiki years ago, ultimately leading to the creation of this place, because some dude named "mignash" was such a pain on Wikipedia. Such a pain. He was so big of a pain that he was even banned from there for a time! So no, you're not allowed. Neither you nor your fun political insanities. --ItsWalky 10:28, 23 November 2009 (EST)

THANK YOU. I do not want edit-wars all over Shattered Glass.

(Believe it or not, now I feel embarrassed about supporting his bid to include a mention of the Seekers on the Wikipedia article on the F-15 Eagle.) ---Blackout- 10:36, 23 November 2009 (EST)

What political insanities? Because I added a comment on Obama, which isn't even that bad? Rosicrucian asked me not to revert the page any more and I did as asked. so it seems you are into banning people you don't like?

68.61.240.172 10:41, 23 November 2009 (EST)