Talk:Lockdown (ROTF): Difference between revisions
Karhukjnsi (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Karhukjnsi (talk | contribs) →Then why keep the "stealing parts" bit?: new section |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:So I take it then you ''haven't'' read the [[Help:Official info|official info help page]] that the Scoop Bastard notice links to, then? --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 02:28, 6 January 2010 (EST) | :So I take it then you ''haven't'' read the [[Help:Official info|official info help page]] that the Scoop Bastard notice links to, then? --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 02:28, 6 January 2010 (EST) | ||
:Very well, then, play it that way? Then you shouldn't be against this. --[[User:Karhukjnsi|The Beerclaw]] 02:33, 6 January 2010 (EST) | :Very well, then, play it that way? Then you shouldn't be against this. --[[User:Karhukjnsi|The Beerclaw]] 02:33, 6 January 2010 (EST) | ||
== Then why keep the "stealing parts" bit? == | |||
There's nothing officially released that declares he "steals parts". Just because he can use Ratchet's weapon does not directly indicate that he "steals parts" for all we know he could've bought it off the Autobot medic regardless of absurdity. So if you're going to take off any potential mentions of his profession (which is what he's initially referenced from) then why allow something else that is unofficially recognized? This is a paragon example of abuse of power. --[[User:Karhukjnsi|The Beerclaw]] 02:50, 6 January 2010 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 07:50, 6 January 2010
Seriously, we know he's going to be a bounty hunter, he's based off a bounty hunter, official release or not, his card states he's a bounty hunter. This isn't anything close to anything offensive, so why are you so up in arms against a CORRECT categorization? - Karhukjnsi —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Karhukjnsi (talk • contribs).
- So I take it then you haven't read the official info help page that the Scoop Bastard notice links to, then? --Detour 02:28, 6 January 2010 (EST)
- Very well, then, play it that way? Then you shouldn't be against this. --The Beerclaw 02:33, 6 January 2010 (EST)
Then why keep the "stealing parts" bit?
There's nothing officially released that declares he "steals parts". Just because he can use Ratchet's weapon does not directly indicate that he "steals parts" for all we know he could've bought it off the Autobot medic regardless of absurdity. So if you're going to take off any potential mentions of his profession (which is what he's initially referenced from) then why allow something else that is unofficially recognized? This is a paragon example of abuse of power. --The Beerclaw 02:50, 6 January 2010 (EST)
