Talk:Hammer (weapon): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think we're playing very fast and loose with the definition of "hammer" on this one.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 12:32, 20 December 2009 (EST) | I think we're playing very fast and loose with the definition of "hammer" on this one.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 12:32, 20 December 2009 (EST) | ||
:I do fail to see how Silverbolt's feather-things could possibly be considered hammers. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 13:25, 20 December 2009 (EST) | :I do fail to see how Silverbolt's feather-things could possibly be considered hammers. --[[User:KilMichaelMcC|KilMichaelMcC]] 13:25, 20 December 2009 (EST) | ||
::Suggest merging this page with [[Mace]]? and possibly renaming it something like maces/flails/hammers/clubs/blunt objects for beating...[[User:MadmanFoidart|MadmanFoidart]] 17:22, 5 February 2010 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 22:22, 5 February 2010
I think we're playing very fast and loose with the definition of "hammer" on this one.--RosicrucianTalk 12:32, 20 December 2009 (EST)
- I do fail to see how Silverbolt's feather-things could possibly be considered hammers. --KilMichaelMcC 13:25, 20 December 2009 (EST)
- Suggest merging this page with Mace? and possibly renaming it something like maces/flails/hammers/clubs/blunt objects for beating...MadmanFoidart 17:22, 5 February 2010 (EST)
