Talk:James Remar: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
DrSpengler (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:::Given the fact you jumped all over me for that Ausgamers thing, I would have thought this article's creation would have caused some discussion. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 20:52, 17 June 2010 (EDT) | :::Given the fact you jumped all over me for that Ausgamers thing, I would have thought this article's creation would have caused some discussion. --[[User:FFN|FFN]] 20:52, 17 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
::::Yeah well I figured with the article locked from anons... the WfC page would've been spared from unsourced statements. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 20:56, 17 June 2010 (EDT) | ::::Yeah well I figured with the article locked from anons... the WfC page would've been spared from unsourced statements. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 20:56, 17 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
:::::Someone also added the WfC Starscream thing back onto [[Doug Parker]]'s article. Has THAT been confirmed? --[[User:DrSpengler|DrSpengler]] 21:39, 17 June 2010 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 01:39, 18 June 2010
So, was this actually confirmed? --FFN 19:57, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
- I also would like to know. --ItsWalky 20:19, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
- I as well, but I like Remar so I filled out his article anyway. --Detour 20:21, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
- Given the fact you jumped all over me for that Ausgamers thing, I would have thought this article's creation would have caused some discussion. --FFN 20:52, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
- Yeah well I figured with the article locked from anons... the WfC page would've been spared from unsourced statements. --Detour 20:56, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
- Someone also added the WfC Starscream thing back onto Doug Parker's article. Has THAT been confirmed? --DrSpengler 21:39, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
- Yeah well I figured with the article locked from anons... the WfC page would've been spared from unsourced statements. --Detour 20:56, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
- Given the fact you jumped all over me for that Ausgamers thing, I would have thought this article's creation would have caused some discussion. --FFN 20:52, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
- I as well, but I like Remar so I filled out his article anyway. --Detour 20:21, 17 June 2010 (EDT)
