Template talk:MarvelUKinterior: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
→Colourized B&W images: new section |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::So you would solely credit [[Pat Lee]] for a page actually done (ghosted/uncredited) by Alex Milne because the comic gave the credit to Lee? Surely accuracy is paramount, and more important than maintaining a misleading credit. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 19:53, 28 October 2009 (EDT) | ::So you would solely credit [[Pat Lee]] for a page actually done (ghosted/uncredited) by Alex Milne because the comic gave the credit to Lee? Surely accuracy is paramount, and more important than maintaining a misleading credit. - [[User:Mammalian Verisimilitude|Mammalian Verisimilitude]] 19:53, 28 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::Not really, so long as nobody goes completely uncredited. If you look at the [[Target: 2006|comic]] [[In the National Interest|story]] [[Prey!|pages]] on the wiki, it is actually common practise to give an "art" credit if that's the way it was originally presented. That's why {{tl|Comicstory}} has a thousand different permutations, in case an issue uses "script", "scripter", "scripting", or "script by". The comics say that "art" and "colour" are two distinct jobs, the wiki says note it as they present it, the Dude abides. - [[User:Magnus Maximus|Magnus Maximus]] 20:15, 28 October 2009 (EDT) | :::Not really, so long as nobody goes completely uncredited. If you look at the [[Target: 2006|comic]] [[In the National Interest|story]] [[Prey!|pages]] on the wiki, it is actually common practise to give an "art" credit if that's the way it was originally presented. That's why {{tl|Comicstory}} has a thousand different permutations, in case an issue uses "script", "scripter", "scripting", or "script by". The comics say that "art" and "colour" are two distinct jobs, the wiki says note it as they present it, the Dude abides. - [[User:Magnus Maximus|Magnus Maximus]] 20:15, 28 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Colourized B&W images == | |||
[[Image:Solid light optimus the hunting party.jpg|right|100px]] | |||
[[Image:HuntingParty-Mayhem Attack Squad small.JPG|right|100px]] | |||
These issues are not exactly from #229 like it says in the description (since they are in colour). Could another field be added to list the issue they were colourized in? - [[User:Starfield|Starfield]] 11:25, 10 July 2012 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:25, 10 July 2012
How can you have separate 'art' and 'colors' credits for a colored piece, as in the example? Surely it should be LINE art and colors. Mammalian Verisimilitude 18:22, 28 October 2009 (EDT)
- Ask the people who credited it that way. - Magnus Maximus 18:48, 28 October 2009 (EDT)
- So you would solely credit Pat Lee for a page actually done (ghosted/uncredited) by Alex Milne because the comic gave the credit to Lee? Surely accuracy is paramount, and more important than maintaining a misleading credit. - Mammalian Verisimilitude 19:53, 28 October 2009 (EDT)
- Not really, so long as nobody goes completely uncredited. If you look at the comic story pages on the wiki, it is actually common practise to give an "art" credit if that's the way it was originally presented. That's why {{Comicstory}} has a thousand different permutations, in case an issue uses "script", "scripter", "scripting", or "script by". The comics say that "art" and "colour" are two distinct jobs, the wiki says note it as they present it, the Dude abides. - Magnus Maximus 20:15, 28 October 2009 (EDT)
- So you would solely credit Pat Lee for a page actually done (ghosted/uncredited) by Alex Milne because the comic gave the credit to Lee? Surely accuracy is paramount, and more important than maintaining a misleading credit. - Mammalian Verisimilitude 19:53, 28 October 2009 (EDT)
Colourized B&W images
These issues are not exactly from #229 like it says in the description (since they are in colour). Could another field be added to list the issue they were colourized in? - Starfield 11:25, 10 July 2012 (EDT)
