User talk:Suki Brits/Nightbeat

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Clearly needs some polish (as the bars are more or less my thrown-together-in-sixty-seconds sample), but I think we're onto a good start here. It most certainly helps break up the major sections, particularly those that need separating lines WITHIN them (like any large fiction section, and probably the Toys section between lines, why not). And the colored image borders do make a nice addition to the look of the page.
Of course, the coding would have to become an easy-peasy template. {{DecepPic|_______}}, {{AutoToys}}, {{MediaTrivia}}, whatever. The BIG sections that are currently served by the ==Headername== shouldn't have all that much variety to them. --M Sipher 21:49, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Huh. I kinda like it. Would we use different colors for different factions, or is that too problematic (everyone gets blue or black?) -hx
I had thought of breaking it down like this...
  • Autobot/Maximal/etc-sided (including *Master partners, Mini-Cons, mechanoids) - Red
  • Decepticon/Predacon/Vehicon/etc-sided (same) - Purple
  • Humans (Earth-folks) - Blue
  • Aliens (Quints, Zabra, etc) - Green
  • Unicron (Blentrons, Planet X, Armada Nem Prime... guys who are basically ONLY loyal to Uni first and foremost) - Black with white text
  • "Media" (episode/issue pages, creators) - Yellow
  • Misc (whatever doesn't really fit elsewhere) - Steel-blue/gray
That might should cover everything well enough. Suggestions welcome. --M Sipher 22:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Hrm. Blackarachnia? --ItsWalky 00:00, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Predominantly Pred/Decep. Yeah, there are faction-switchers aplenty, but really, pretty much every TF character is predominantly a "good guy" or "bad guy"...--M Sipher 00:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Nice work. I've been thinking that this place needs sprucing up. Given that its Teletraan-1, how about making the background borders orange, and the article area itself dark blue with white text? --FFN 22:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Please, no. Black on white is fine. Put some borders in, sure, but I am firmly against doing any mucking-about with the background colors. -hx 23:39, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
I echo that. - Chris McFeely 23:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
I am also firmly against background colors. --ItsWalky 00:00, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Always agree. The background/text colors as they are work as good or better than any other. We really only want a TOUCH of color to liven things up, not a massive deco change. --M Sipher 00:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
This header design looks FANTASTIC. I've always thought that the various headers and subheads and so on were confusing in appearance, and this helps tremendously in sorting out all the content. My one critique is that it feels stronger in terms of visual weight than it should be. It REALLY dominates the page. So I've tried shrinking both the type and the box:

Sample

And I also wonder how just a border would do:

Sample

The reason I would tone it down that far is that there's no way that I know of to increase the visual weight of the article title (say, by putting it in a colored box too). And it seems wrong to me for the headers to grab so much more attention than the title.
But anyhow. Take my suggestions as you will. I think the design is off to a great start, no matter how they end up. - Jackpot 02:39, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
You know, I like that border one. I kinda wonder if we could give it the same pale background the picture borders would have... that'd add color without being overwhelming and tie into the overall look of the page... --M Sipher 03:09, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Mm?

Sample

- Jackpot 03:26, 19 April 2007 (UTC)