Talk:Michael Bay

I put back in my FUNNY based on the BC06 promo reel. It is not "vandalism." KILL BAY NOW is vandalism, and this article has seen plenty of it, and obviously will have to continue to be watched until the hater cult goes back to masturbating. --Thylacine 2000 13:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

I think a more substantial article would disuade most vandals. It's a psychological

effect. For something so short people feel like they're not damaging something with much value. -Derik 19:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Actually, a more substational article about the reasons for killing Bay would probably be a good compromise.

Erm... yeah. Because a movie you don't like is worth threatening somebody's life over, right? Riiiight... --FFN 21:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

• Well...I'm absolutely distrubed. -- SFH 21:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Evidently there's no law against threatening somebody on the internet like there is in Real Life. This is just another reason why I think the Internet License Test and the Internet Police should be established. The Internet Police patrol the Knowledge Mega Autobahn. --FFN 21:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Hmm. Perhaps my suggestion was not the bridge-building compromise I thought it was.

Credible threats are illegal -- in the US at least -- regardless of how they are made. The "threat" above is obviously not credible. --Steve-o 22:26, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

From Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki, a Wikia wiki.