Talk:Decepticon Super Scramble
From MediaWiki
Is 'Decepticon Super Scramble' a name or a description? --FFN 07:08, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Well, ugh, not sure. Only known that (Faction) Super Scramble is what used to called the character. According to the description in the book, these two formations of combination are the most powerful[1] among Autobot and Decepticon Scramble-city type combiners respectively. --TX55 07:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- ↑ Thus they are called "Super Scrambles".
If a 'Super Scramble' is a generic descriptor, than this is a description, not a name. (Probably needs to go into namesless characters.) -Derik 08:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- I cut out the Decepticon guy from the scanned image, removed the background and the blue lines - had to redraw the parts the blue lines obscured >:( I hate it when perfectly good art is ruined with lines and words superimposed on top! --FFN 11:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Here's a larger version before you do the other one. --Monzo 11:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, you were working from the larger one anyway. Nevermind. --Monzo 11:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yup - I might need time to figure out how to redraw the Computron-looking guy's chest. It's bloody annoying to redraw things. I need a drawing tablet or something, methinks. --FFN 12:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, you were working from the larger one anyway. Nevermind. --Monzo 11:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Here's a larger version before you do the other one. --Monzo 11:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Where does this combination appear?
I think this article is incomplete without mentioning where this character appears. I assume it's some Japanese manga continuity. Can someone please add this info? --GrantB 18:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- As I understand it, he's mainly just an appearance in Japanese toy catalogs to say "this is what you can do with Scramble City Combiners." He has no fictional appearances of note.--RosicrucianTalk 18:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Added this detail to the article, with a citation needed tag, because I don't know when/who issued the catalog. Maybe someone else could add that. I just thought the article needed some info to indicate why this combination merits its own article (when I first saw the article, I couldn't see why this combo was more legitimate than the Stunticon/Technobot combo my friend had when he was 9). Thanks! --GrantB 18:21, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- If you check the image source, you can see it's from TV Magazine Color Special #33 Transformer: The Headmasters. --RosicrucianTalk 18:24, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- Interrobang, why did you revert it? What does "out-universeness" mean?--GrantB 18:23, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- We tend to save breaking the fourth wall like that for the toy or trivia sections.--RosicrucianTalk 18:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- If I added this info in the toy section, would that have been (be) kosher? (And someone has since explained "out-uni" to me, thanks) --GrantB 03:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- That'd be okay. I should've done that in the first place, but ah well. —Interrobang 03:58, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- If I added this info in the toy section, would that have been (be) kosher? (And someone has since explained "out-uni" to me, thanks) --GrantB 03:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- We tend to save breaking the fourth wall like that for the toy or trivia sections.--RosicrucianTalk 18:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- Added this detail to the article, with a citation needed tag, because I don't know when/who issued the catalog. Maybe someone else could add that. I just thought the article needed some info to indicate why this combination merits its own article (when I first saw the article, I couldn't see why this combo was more legitimate than the Stunticon/Technobot combo my friend had when he was 9). Thanks! --GrantB 18:21, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

