Talk:Prowl (RID)

Prowl 2

So, I gather the "Prowl 2" toy has no bio? JW 13:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

you gather correctly. He, Side Swipe and Daytonus went bio-less despite their many releases. -Derik 13:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

While I find your "Chip-Prowl = RiD-Prowl 2 = Owl-Prowl II" theory kinda neat (now that it's been explained to me), I'm afraid my better judgment says to invoke Occam's Razor here: "Entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity." Barring more substantive proof than Ichikawa being cute, the Prowl 2 toy should be assumed to be the same guy as Prowl (RID) by default.

However, I would support the addition of a trivia note to this article: "As the Prowl 2 toy has no bio, it is only probably the same character as Prowl. The Japanese booklet for the Binaltech release of Alternators Prowl (G1) states that his Binaltech body was originally designated 'Prowl 2'. As in Japan the RID continuity (called Car Robots there) is (arguably) part of G1, this can be read as a retcon of the identity of the Prowl 2 toy. This fanon theory has not found wide acceptance, however."

Is this note acceptable to people? JW 14:35, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Occam's Razor demands that the bio-less Prowl 2 be Prowl instead of Prowl II, despite Prowl II's bio referencing Prowl 2 (using that name format!) and existing in the same continuity?

That's a pretty screwy rendition of Occam's Razor you've got going there Sweeny Todd. -Derik 14:50, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

When you say "Prowl II's bio" are you referring to Owl-Prowl's bio or Chip-Prowl's bio?

Also, I'm trying to help here, so could you be civil? JW 14:58, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

From Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki, a Wikia wiki.