User talk:Hooper X
From MediaWiki
What exactly is upsetting you, again? Singularity 07:11, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- The ridiculous arbitrariness of your naming schema, most specifically your need to make a very simple system unnecessarily complex. Hooper X 07:12, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- You mean like moving stuff from "(UT)" to "(Unicron Trilogy)", of which... you seem to agree with (I don't particularly care for the "(Armada)" or "(Unicron Trilogy)" deal). Or "(cartoon)" to "(television series)" which is hardly complicated, nor does it particularly harm anybody (removes the fuzzy line between "animated series" and "comic"). It also streamlines it with the category and the constant references to "television series".
Or, uh, what? Singularity 07:31, 11 March 2006 (UTC)- I've actually kind of gone over to the other camp that, as long as there's a unified acronym for each era, the acronyms are considerably easier to use. Hooper X 07:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- That doesn't really help the peope who don't know what the acronyms stand for (Dirge (T)? UT? C'mon.) or the acronym is already taken (Hey, Bowel Machines.). Singularity 07:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- That's why we put the Unified Abbreviation System in the [[[Style Guide]]. Duh. Hooper X 05:04, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- That doesn't really help the peope who don't know what the acronyms stand for (Dirge (T)? UT? C'mon.) or the acronym is already taken (Hey, Bowel Machines.). Singularity 07:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- I've actually kind of gone over to the other camp that, as long as there's a unified acronym for each era, the acronyms are considerably easier to use. Hooper X 07:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- You mean like moving stuff from "(UT)" to "(Unicron Trilogy)", of which... you seem to agree with (I don't particularly care for the "(Armada)" or "(Unicron Trilogy)" deal). Or "(cartoon)" to "(television series)" which is hardly complicated, nor does it particularly harm anybody (removes the fuzzy line between "animated series" and "comic"). It also streamlines it with the category and the constant references to "television series".
You are unnecessarily awesome. -Derik 04:12, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
EW Sky Lynx
Hoop, can you take a pic of this against a couple sheets of white paper? --M Sipher 04:12, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- When I get one, sure! -hx 12:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
The caption
Hi, just saw the new caption for P.'s new caption for Holomatter avatar, that's really awesome! Ha ha ha. --TX55 15:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Ban?
Is this guy blockable already? He is destructively foul and evil and also did alot of crimes.
- He attacked an American Airbase and destroyed a C-130
- He attacks users
- He is evil and hates everyone like Bonecrusher
- He attacked Angela
- He is foul
- He messed with Optimus the F22s Userpage
- He humped his mom alot
- He and Detour united to ban various users
- He never got blocked once
- He vandalized other Wikis once
(68.190.228.12 23:36, 26 December 2007 (UTC))
Minis
Oh hell yes. If you can snatch one of each, that'd be awesome. ...The Bootleg Mini-Cons, I mean. I can do without the Nitro cologne.
- (Now, you too can smell like a wrestling mat!) --M Sipher 20:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
?
if you hate TF so much, why the heck are you even here?!?!? American Girl 17:37, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Shits and giggles? -hx 19:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ugh. Kids....User:GWolfV2
SO I DON'T FORGET
potential questions for hasbro in the future:
- (for the entire TF team) The TF brand has presented hundreds, if not thousands of weird and wonderful characters over the last 25 years. Who are, respectively, your most and least favorite characters from TF history? (C'mon, be honest. We'll understand if you secretly hate Grapple.)
- similar question, except about concepts: which concepts from TF history would you most like to bring back? which one would you be glad to never see again?
- We know that due to changes in toy safety laws, we're never getting a realistic hand-gun Megatron ever again. We've heard that the "spark-shooting" action found on some G1 toys is a similar situation. Are there any other gimmicks we're unlikely to see in the future because of legal/safety concerns?
- The unreleased Robot Heroes "Dessaras" figure - why was that name chosen? Did "Deathsaurus" fail to clear legal or were there other concerns (retailers/parents/children not wanting to buy a toy with the word "Death" in its name, "Deathsaurus" being an admittedly goofy moniker, etc.)
- In regards to store exclusives, how much input does the retail partner have into the finished product? Is it "give us X figures at price point Y" or is it more hands-on than that - "give us an Autobot car and a Decepticon jet, and the Autobot should be in such-and-such a color scheme..."
- At one point near the end of the Alternators sub-line, a major retailer's computer system listed several toys that never saw the light of day - Megatron as a Cadillac, as well as repaints of the Scion and Mustang molds. Who were the Scion and Mustang intended to be, if they even got to that stage of development?
- (for the entire TF team) Theoretical question: If you could make a Transformer toy of anything in the world that hasn't ALREADY been a Transformers toy, what would it be? You can be as specific (1973 AMC Javelin AMX in Big Bad Blue, The General Lee) or as general (school bus, tractor) as you wish.
- Some kind of question about recutting old molds to repair them, as was done with the G1 Jazz mold. How far gone does a mold have to be for this to be viable? Can a mold be TOO far gone for this to be viable?
- subquestion about the Classics Starscream mold, which is starting to show some wear - can it be recut and if so, will it be recut, as people seem to be willing to buy it by the dozen.
- Regarding the larger Titanium Series figures: Is it theoretically possible to manufacture these figures using plastic instead of die-cast, or are they designed in such a way that using plastic would limit the durability, integrity, or stability of the finished product?
