Talk:Rampage (ROTF)

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

...maybe not a part of Devastator?

Perhaps the movie will make it clearer, but... well, in the adaptation he's present at the same time as the other Constructicons form Devastator.--RosicrucianTalk 02:51, 17 June 2009 (EDT)

I don't remember where I heard this, but I seem to recall someone saying Devastator not having any preset configuration, and just being formed out of whatever components are nearby. He is present in the Devastator toys. --Detour 02:58, 17 June 2009 (EDT)
The Constructicons are going to be complicated. No one except Demolishor is named in either the comic or novel. We know Devastator forms with Rampage and Long Haul from the toys. Since we see Rampage and Long Haul after Devastator forms I think there are two possibilities. 1) Those aren't Rampage and Long Haul we see but look-alikes. or 2) Devastator can form with any combination of Constructicons, including Rampage and Long Haul, but simply didn't include those two this time, meaning the toy is formed from different Constructicons than the movie. Unless, of course, the film clears this up. - Starfield 11:09, 17 June 2009 (EDT)
Just say Rampage the Yellow Leg guy...... and meanwhile he's also Rampage the Red Guy Who Fights Bumblebee. --FFN 11:12, 17 June 2009 (EDT)
That's no fun, and illogical. Usually continuity errors like that are separated by a few comic issues or episodes. I was looking forward to a "Rampage II" page or something. But if the fiction is illogical, you might be right that the wiki should reflect that instead of trying to patch it up. Another item of note: Rampage the Red is yellow in the comic. - Starfield 11:35, 17 June 2009 (EDT)
Detour--I wasn't at BC09, but I've read reports that source that notion to Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci's panel. They purportedly said that there is a huge tribe of Constructicons, of which any number may combine into Devastator, the latter being like a giant metal amoeba. --Thylacine 2000 11:38, 17 June 2009 (EDT)
Such a concept, if it can be written up well enough, would be ideal for the wiki to cover.--RosicrucianTalk 11:42, 17 June 2009 (EDT)