Talk:Gigatron
- The toys section needs to mention at least' the HOC figurine as him.
- Also- the tech-specs IIRC has a common thread between all the releases- Gigatron (though filtered through a US perspective) is almost certainly 'supposed to be' Overlord... but nobody wants to dislodge Overlord from his UK name. -Derik 18:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Disambiguation
Surely there's a way to merge the two disambig boxes up there into one? It'd look a lot tidier if it could read "This article is about the Powermaster. For the Godmaster, see Overlord; or the for the Predacon Leader in Robots in Disguise, see Megatron (RID)." Of course, I'm a drunken Irish bum and haven't the slightest idea how to make that happen. Jeep! 15:08, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- Multiple didambigs have been bugging me for awhile- there's some articles with 3. We disambig things waaay more than normal Wikipedia articles because of name re-use.
- From a technical standpoint, yes it's possible. But can you come up with a visual treatment? One that accommodates all 3 types of the disambig tags? -Derik 15:14, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- I could make a picture of how it might look, but I have no idea how to make the template that would make it work. Jeep! 18:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Multi-component Transformer
If someone were just reading Gigatron's bio with no knowledge of who he was redecoed from, he would probably conclude he is a triple-changer (the bio is vague on the matter). But since we know he is redecoed from Overlord, I thought the common-sense thing to do would be to consider him a multi-component Transformer, so that's what category I put him in. Just an FYI. - Starfield 18:07, 29 August 2009 (EDT)
Yeah, and this might be a stupid question, but how do we know it's supposed to be Gigatron in Megatron Origin and not Overlord? There's a similar argument made on the SG Overlord page. -Mazenoise 18:20, 29 August 2009 (EDT)
- Overlord actually seems much more likely to me, unless we're taking the position that Gigatron is merely the English name for Overlord ... but then this page wouldn't exist at all.--76.167.101.0 18:23, 29 August 2009 (EDT)
