Talk:King Poseidon

Shouldn't the entry be for "Piranacon," with King Poseidon listed as the Japanese name? - Dark T Zeratul 04:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

We decided theyr'e seperate characters represented by identical toys, just like Lander is not Landmine, and Clouburst is not Phoenix. -Derik 04:27, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Or like how B'Boom is not Apache! --ItsWalky 05:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Just out of curiosity, how are those kinds of things decided? - Dark T Zeratul 07:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, on one of the OTHER Seacon pages (I thinkt here's like 3) someon (in this case me) said "Look, I've compared things, and the MF seacons, despite having 1 name in common, are completely different characters- nncharacters really. Theyr'e drones except Turtular. They should not be listed as the same character as the US Seacons."

And we discussed it back and forth a bit, decided thatyes, Turtular definately IS NOT Snaptrap, and decided to follow that into puttign them on a seperate page.

Who goes where is kinda mess right now, come combiner teams are listed under their team name, soem udner their gestalt name- I expect we'll end up standardizing things under Gestalt names some day. But for now as the entries are still being filled in, we just deal with it. -Derik 07:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

It seems to be a bit of a judgement call as to whether a given toy/figure/entity is a different character across continuities. I guess it depends on just how much the differences stand out or affect the character. --Ratbat 08:20, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

The question becomes, then, if for the purposes of this Wiki King Poseidon is not Piranacon, Lander is not Landmine, etc (which I agree with), why DID we decide that Gigatron was Overlord? - Chris McFeely 10:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Because Gigatron, Overlord and Ovalrolled (MF Overlord) all share language on their tech-specs. Gitgatron and Overlord share a quote even. The central block of text about their onboard munitions factory is present in all 3, strongly indicating they're all the same character. This is, IIRC, on the talk page.

You disagree I take it? Why? -Derik 13:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

To be quite hones, I don't ACTUALLY disagree... it's wierdly fuzzy in my head. My brain is full of Masterforce after the DVD work, and it's just that everyone else in the whole Masterforce series is treated as a different character to their Western counterpart on the Wiki, so for Overlord to not be just feels odd and sore-thumbish to me. It's not that I don't see the logic in it, or anything, 'cause I totally do. - Chris McFeely

From Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki, a Wikia wiki.