Talk:Cigar

I thought for sure I had a better closeup of Kup and his cigar, but I can't find it on any other pages. Am I crazy? --ItsWalky 12:09, 20 July 2009 (EDT)

split cy-gar into its own article?

Shouldn't it be split off into it's own article? This article is about the human cigar, but then we shove in the cy-gar at the bottom. --FFN 10:02, 23 June 2010 (EDT)

I think that's unnecessary.--Jimsorenson 10:06, 23 June 2010 (EDT)

I think it's okay to have its own page. It's just like Rust and Cosmic Rust (disease) in some way (I can't come up with a better idea for now). --TX55^TALK 10:23, 23 June 2010 (EDT)

I vote for it being split. A cy-gar seems to be pretty much a different concept altogether, that just ends up being roughly analogous to our human cigars. But we'd still disambig the two subjects I'd assume. --Ascendron 11:08, 23 June 2010 (EDT)

If it is split, there probably doesn't need to be a cigar page, really. I think that information is there just to make the page more joke-y. The page was created before the thing that Kup was chewing on got retconned into a cy-gar. - Starfield 11:15, 23 June 2010 (EDT)

delete

I don't see any reason to delete this page. Then again, I didn't think we should split it, either.--Jimsorenson 12:10, 21 August 2010 (EDT)

Deletion might be going a bit too far since the article discusses other cigars. Then again, we don't note every instance of, say, a character wearing a hat, so blah. I have mixed feelings about it. --NCZ 12:19, 21 August 2010 (EDT)

Yea, cigars might be too ordinary. Like a hat. The wiki isn't a dictionary. It was an ironic article before Kup's cigar had a function, but now there isn't much point. - Starfield 12:22, 21 August 2010 (EDT)

On the other hand, a cigar was critical to Mark Twain's defeat of Ravage. -- SFH 13:29, 21 August 2010 (EDT)

Really? Hm, didn't know that; I've no interest in Hearts of Steel. This might be worth keeping, with modifications. And apparently, Kup's cigar was an attempt at humanization later retconned into a "cy-gar". That could be noted. --NCZ 13:52, 21 August 2010 (EDT)