Talk:Spychanger

... G1 continuty? What the hell? --M Sipher 01:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, that was my fault. I was typing quick and I usually only write entries for G1 folks so I did it without even noticing. ZacWilliam 02:19, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Universe

There was some info on this wiki about a voice actor play with the G1 Spy Changers. I can't find it now. Would that info belong here, or in a different artiicle, because they were from a Spy Changer universe or something? --Crockalley 04:04, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

There was an OTFCC 04(?) script reading, yeah, in which Spychangers played a part. I don't really remember much of it, sadly. It should be at least mentioned in this article. --ItsWalky 05:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

"Mostly" Autobots? Who's the exception? --MCRG 08:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Dear Me- The answer is Scourge, doofus. --MCRG 08:18, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

One of the things I didn't know for sure was IF the Universe releases were specifically called Spy Changers? Is it on their packages? What about the later ones like Camshaft? Are they all officially SCs. I couldn't remember exactly who falls under the title. - ZacWilliam 14:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Does the OTFCC script reading call them Spy Changers? --Crockalley 14:44, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

No. -LV 00:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Parsing

Is it "Spy Changer" or "Spychanger", as per the category? Interrobang 08:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

As is all too often the case, both. (I prefer Spy Changers because that was used first.) -LV 00:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Which set is the e-hobby SC's -Derik 21:43, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

eHobby spies?

Which set is the eHobby set? Is that the Super Spy Changers? -75.168.123.161 14:52, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Woof!

This page is kind of ... well, very inaccurate. Frankly, there's probably more Spy Changers who aren't in the RID group than are, yet this page is entirely about the RID group. Spy Changers went on for years! --ItsWalky 01:43, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

At this point, is "Spy Changer" a group designation or is it more of a technology designation? I mean, there were plenty of Spy Changers outside of RiD, right? It almost feels like "Spy Changer" isn't a subteam, it's more of a feature, like "Combiners" or "Triple Changers," you know? Hooper_X 09:11, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

List of mold reuses?

Given how many times the Go-Bot/Spychanger molds have been redecoed and recycled, it'd be nice to have a complete list of uses for each mold, though I'm not sure where it should go. Also, though I could get it started, I am totally NOT the person to finish it.

Also, what Walky said up there. Like the Triple Changers, "Spychanger" has come to mean a specific fictional group but a much larger and looser group in toy terms. We should address it somehow, even if it's just a note. -- Repowers 02:32, 14 June 2009 (EDT)

I'd almost say break it off into "Spy Changer (Group)" and "Spy Changer (Toys)" or similar. One article about the fictional exploits of the RiD Spy Changers and one about the actual toys - didn't one of the OTFCC stories say something about how the Spychanger RiD Prime and Magnus were from a universe where everyone was smaller, or words to that effect? Hooper_X 10:10, 14 June 2009 (EDT)

That was actually about the Universe Spy Changer versions of Prime and Magnus (along with Prowl and some others), who were alternate universe incarnations of the respective characters. The RID Spy Changer Prime and Magnus are presumably supposed to be the same characters as the bigger versions. -Mazenoise 10:35, 14 June 2009 (EDT)

Japanese versions?

Should there be something in here about the heat-sensitive paint used similarly to rubsigns on these in Japan?--76.226.104.241 18:44, 4 April 2012 (EDT)