Talk:Starscream (Animated)
Not being very familiar with Gundam, I tried to find images of the fighter that User:66.114.66.77 has added. What I found was this, which doesn't have swept-forward wings at all. What am I missing? --Steve-o 15:11, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
How is he a fucking Su-47 Berkut? What does he look like? Where is his fucking vehicle mode photo?
- Again, the toy isn't out yet. We've seen some at Comic Con, but that one was painted up as Thundercracker, and was a hand-painted proto to my knowledge. We can't really put much up until there's more official stuff.--Rosicrucian 00:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- No, it was painted as Starscream. --FortMax 01:25, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Starscream is dark blue now?--Rosicrucian 02:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- He certainly is in the clips we've seen... --ItsWalky 02:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Weird.--Rosicrucian 02:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Starscream is not so blue in actual screen grabs from the animation here: http://derrickjwyatt.blogspot.com/2007/07/transformers-animated-at-comic-con-2007.html --Swindle 03:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- If you say so! --ItsWalky 13:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Considering the quality of the screen grab on Swindle's link is better than on yours, I'd tend to agree with him more. --Detour 13:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- If you say so! --ItsWalky 13:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Starscream is not so blue in actual screen grabs from the animation here: http://derrickjwyatt.blogspot.com/2007/07/transformers-animated-at-comic-con-2007.html --Swindle 03:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Weird.--Rosicrucian 02:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- He certainly is in the clips we've seen... --ItsWalky 02:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Starscream is dark blue now?--Rosicrucian 02:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- No, it was painted as Starscream. --FortMax 01:25, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Eyedropping that one ALSO gives you blue. Starscream is also blue in Eric_Siebenaler's Animated art for the next issue of the Collector's Club magazine, as seen in a recent upload here. --ItsWalky 15:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Re: Starscream being blue now: Why not? He's already been black, dark grey, copper green, tan, and black and purple.
- If you look at it, you can see that all the decepticons has that basic purple color on them, so they look more like a whole military-unit raither then a bunch of rapair-bots. -Hepathos 16:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Re: Starscream being blue now: Why not? He's already been black, dark grey, copper green, tan, and black and purple.
- Eyedropping that one ALSO gives you blue. Starscream is also blue in Eric_Siebenaler's Animated art for the next issue of the Collector's Club magazine, as seen in a recent upload here. --ItsWalky 15:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
His toy next year once it comes out or something will be mighty expensive. Hey I saw his jet mode and it looks like a Cybertronian Jet based off a Su-47 Berkut.(Anti-Spammer 20:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC))
- His toy is a Voyager-class figure. As such, you're looking at around the $20 range, just like all the other Voyagers. It'll still be less expensive than the Ultra/Leader/Supreme toys, if any.--Rosicrucian 20:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Geez, that picture of him makes him look twice as conniving and backstabbing than he ever was in G1.
Quote?
[edit]How come the dramatic "Do not try to deceive a Decepticon" quote isn't used. That sounds really cool. Inferno'sQueen 15:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- I personally think the "solemn face" quote better captures Starscream's personality.
- Also, the very first thing you did upon getting an account here was to change that quote. We prefer that new users make more substantive contributions before tweaking the frippery. JW 15:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm... I guess the "solemn face" is more Starscream-ish. However, I have also uploaded a screencap for Roll Out (online game) and fixed a grammar mistake on this talk page. Inferno'sQueen 15:23, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- We appreciate your efforts, and we look forward to your future contributions.
- However, on Talk pages, I'd strongly recommend against editing other people's comments. Fixing grammar mistakes in articles is wonderful, but you shouldn't edit other people's Talk page comments, unless there is some serious, page-breaking problem in them. In this particular case, your edit was harmless, but I wouldn't do it again. JW 15:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm... I guess the "solemn face" is more Starscream-ish. However, I have also uploaded a screencap for Roll Out (online game) and fixed a grammar mistake on this talk page. Inferno'sQueen 15:23, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
And then Starscream was undead.
Thanks for the tip. ; ) Inferno'sQueen 15:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
A reminder to editors: Spoilers Warnings Please!
[edit]Earlier, somebody put up spoilers for Mission Accomplished without any sort of header or warning. I've added the warning now. Just a reminder to editors to put warnings on new episodes. I'm pretty sure that the newest US episode is the rule, right? --Netbug009 05:25, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- That is correct. Spoiler tags for the newest US episode, and no spoilers in the intro paragraph whatsoever.--RosicrucianTalk 05:37, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- My bad!
Toy
[edit]Does anyone know if a starscream toy will be released in show accurate colors?
Starscream's Cockpit
[edit]Anyone else think Starscream's cockpit looks vaguely like Spongebob's tie? --75.181.69.137 23:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Null rays
[edit]In the Toy Bio to be specific, he has sonic strikers. Where did it ever say nulls antways76.68.69.253 19:35, 11 June 2008 (UTC) My friend has the toy it says his guns are Sonic Blast strikers or something like that, not Null-rays. I think we should take off animated on the null ray page and say he has sonic blast strikers (or something like that. It isn;t a null ray)!
- His Hasbro website bio says he has "Nullray Cannons." --KilMichaelMcC 20:42, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Has this ever happene before? which one is accurate? Is there a protocol for this? When a user gets the toy? 76.68.69.253 20:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- They've been referred to both on the Hasbro website and the cartoon itself as null rays. Stop freaking out.--RosicrucianTalk 20:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- What episode was it reffered to as null rays? And could the sonic thing be noted in the toy section as an error or something? it is interesting. An thundercrackerish. Cycloneprime 20:50, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- It's not even an error. His Hasbro bio refers to both his nullrays and the fact that he "creates a sonic scream that make [sic] powerful sonic blasts of sound that can send enemies spinning through the atmosphere." This is a non-issue.--RosicrucianTalk 21:04, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- What episode was it reffered to as null rays? And could the sonic thing be noted in the toy section as an error or something? it is interesting. An thundercrackerish. Cycloneprime 20:50, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
OK, but it refers to the weapon as a sonic shock blaster and doesn't mention nullrays Cycloneprime 21:20, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- The sonic sreams it refers to aren;t guns, the Profile says Sonic Shock Blaster, and the hasbro sight says nullray cannons not null ray. Which Slagging episode has that line! Tell me! i'll stop arguing if I see that part.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cycloneprime (talk • contribs){{#if:20:18, 13 June 2008| 20:18, 13 June 2008|}}.
- Dude, just let it go. There are things worth getting all Aspergers about. This isn't one of them.--RosicrucianTalk 20:42, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, But someone earlier said it was in a line in an episode, can anyone tell me what episode? My friend is going to post an image of the bio I think, so I will just ask for the episode untill then. On another note, he has flipout rist blasters when you push the sonic shock blaster forward (that is what it says)Cycloneprime 20:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Also, even the sonic screams could be noted as a thundercracker homage. The bio seems to be inaccurate, as it says Prime can barely take screamer out, but this isn;t supported elsewhere. Different Continuity?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cycloneprime (talk • contribs){{#if:20:59, 13 June 2008| 20:59, 13 June 2008|}}.
- You are giving me such a headache.--RosicrucianTalk 21:19, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- I suggest you rewatch Transform and Roll Out! part 3. --ItsWalky 21:09, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you Walky Cycloneprime 21:14, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Transform and Roll Out! is where Prime "can barely take Screamer out." I have no idea where it referenced his null rays. --ItsWalky 21:17, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you Walky Cycloneprime 21:14, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Also, even the sonic screams could be noted as a thundercracker homage. The bio seems to be inaccurate, as it says Prime can barely take screamer out, but this isn;t supported elsewhere. Different Continuity?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cycloneprime (talk • contribs){{#if:20:59, 13 June 2008| 20:59, 13 June 2008|}}.
I think screamer would of won without the plot device, but oh well. Until I find out what episode it is in, i'm not counting that evidence. Would an image of the bio help my case? is the hasbro bio considered more canon then the toy bio? "Oh well. More where they came from"--Cycloneprime 22:14, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- MAybe this means no thundercracker? and I think the Bio problem should be noted somewhere--Cycloneprime 23:39, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Just...stop. You're overthinking this.--RosicrucianTalk 23:52, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Continuity
[edit]Shouldn't the Takara toys be moved to Starscream (Movie)/toys? Like Hot Rod (Henkei!) is seperate from Hot Shot (Armada)?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by TOM (talk • contribs){{#if:| {{{2}}}|}}.
- There is absolutely no evidence that Animated takes place in the movie continuity. --ItsWalky 22:43, 18 August 2010 (EDT)
Actually it does in Japan (not be rude or any thing)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by GalvatronTerror (talk • contribs){{#if:| {{{2}}}|}}.
- No, it doesn't. --Detour 20:10, 6 May 2012 (EDT)