User talk:Khajidha/archive
Stop
[edit]We include the foreign titles so as to make the foreign spellings available. We strive to be as informative as possible and whether the foriegn words translate the same as the English titles is immaterial. We want that info present. So please stop removing information from the pages. If it upsets you that much, then let a discussion actually progress in the talk pages first, before going on a massive info-deleting spree. --DrSpengler 01:28, 26 June 2009 (EDT)
- I thought I was following the example set on the Revenge of the Fallen talk page. There, Walky had stated that foreign titles shouldn't be listed if they were simply a direct translation. I thought that was the consensus and was simply trying to catch examples that had fallen through the cracks. Apparently I was wrong, and I apologize for acting prematurely. Perhaps it is time to examine this policy. I will, of course, follow any decision made. Khajidha 14:28, 26 June 2009 (EDT)
Primes
[edit]Dear Khajidha, I believe you have made an error in your statement "(→Notes: Nexus prime is one of the 13, not the lineage of primes (matrix bearers))". Right here on tfwiki.net you will find the following statements: "They were the first Transformers, and all Primes..... In an answer in October 2009's Q&A Hasbro indicated that only seven of the 13 were Primes." This clearly suggests that since Forest Lee had claimed Nexus to be a Prime and that there exists exactly seven "spirit guides" and that these must therefore be the seven aforesaid Primes, THEN Nexus Prime must be one of these seven "spirit guide" Primes. Can you disprove this by logic? Sincerely, P.C. -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Deszarasu (talk • contribs){{#if:| {{{2}}}|}}. 00:31, 2 August 2010 (EDT)
- The spirit guides from Five Faces of Darkness are seven holders of the Matrix of Leadership before Rodimus Prime. The fact that there are seven of them is a simple coincidence with the "seven of the [original] 13" were Primes. Of the original 13 we have Primon/Alpha Prime, Megatronus Prime/The Fallen, Vector Prime, and Nexus Prime. Only Primon is also one of the Spirit Guides, as he was also the first Matrix bearer. --Khajidha 09:58, 2 August 2010 (EDT)
Thanks
[edit]Merci on the spelling fix in my sandbox. JW 12:02, 5 August 2010 (EDT)
Megatron (Myth)
[edit]I am sorry, but I would like to post the fact the G1 Megatron would have named himself after the Preacon who named himself after the G1 Megatron. Is their a neater way you would prefer me to write it as, you said it was poorly written. LordDalek 10:47, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
Transformers 3
[edit]I did have a source for that, I just forgot where it was. It was revealed on TFW2005.com that on set, a pole with Megatron's head and a pole with Soundwave's head was found on set. Also, on the same website, Starscream's fate was revealed, so he must be in the movie. (I shall not reveal the fate unless asked.)LordDalek 19:54, 5 September 2010 (EDT)
- Set leaks from TFW2005 do not count as official information. Neither does some website about caps talking about what they heard happens. --Detour 20:45, 5 September 2010 (EDT)
- You know, the film crew just confirmed he will be in it and what he turns into. Just saying. Please don't try to kill me Detour. I know you a reading this.LordDalek 17:36, 28 October 2010 (EDT)
Answer
[edit]Agreed. --Waz-z-z-zpinator59 08:48, 12 September 2010 (EDT)
Megatron comment
[edit]You know, I kinda thought that Kibble comment that person wrote on 2007 Megatron's leader class toy caption was kinda funny. It is true, he does have a lot of kibble. Why did you delete that? Was it because of the grammer?LordDalek 17:41, 28 October 2010 (EDT)
- The anonymous editor has not built a record of useful edits, policy is to revert. Also wasn't funny. --Khajidha 18:41, 28 October 2010 (EDT)
- Whatever. I liked it, you didn't. Lets just leave it the way it is without a caption comment.LordDalek 11:39, 29 October 2010 (EDT)
Scoop Bastard
[edit]Why can't I remove just that one tag? I said one thing that Megatron, Starscream and Soundwave are going to be in transformers 3 and I am automatically a scoop bastard because of one thing? So what their heads were seen on set! Who cares. Not to mention the fact that the actual wikipedia says they are in DOTM, so are you going to call them scoop bastards too? I have never done anything else and because of one thing one user doesn't like I am now a scoop bastard? What kind of crap is this? I am not removing the sign your posts thing or the spelling thing, just the thing that says I "stole" information.LordDalek 14:23, 31 October 2010 (EDT)
- You posted unverified information, that means you earned the scoop tag. The term "scoopbastard" may be unfortunate, but that is the name of the tag. What Wikipedia says is irrelevant. No official notice of them being in the movie had been released as of the time you added the information and the tag was added to your page. --Khajidha 14:29, 31 October 2010 (EDT)
- So, I will just have to deal with it. Ok. Look, I can tell i have been getting on your nerves recently. I would just want to apologize for that. It's been a stressful week.LordDalek 11:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT)
- Just make sure to keep the advice in mind in the future. After a long while (say, this time next year) you can move all of this old stuff to an archive page linked to your talk page. --Khajidha 12:32, 1 November 2010 (EDT)
- OK, Thanks for the help. Sorry for the trouble.LordDalek 11:31, 3 November 2010 (EDT)
- Just make sure to keep the advice in mind in the future. After a long while (say, this time next year) you can move all of this old stuff to an archive page linked to your talk page. --Khajidha 12:32, 1 November 2010 (EDT)
- So, I will just have to deal with it. Ok. Look, I can tell i have been getting on your nerves recently. I would just want to apologize for that. It's been a stressful week.LordDalek 11:40, 1 November 2010 (EDT)
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
[edit]Enjoy. ---Blackout- 06:12, 23 January 2011 (EST)
- At least they came to the correct conclusion. People CAN agree without being the same person, even if others don't like what they agree on. --Khajidha 10:51, 23 January 2011 (EST)
Good
[edit]now i'm A-1, thanks
--Metroplex 16:58, 2 April 2011 (EDT)
Still pretty confused
[edit]I read the disambig but am kind of in the dark. How many pages should be in a category before it is needed? I thought 2 was minimum, I get if it's a higher number but I'm wondering if the guideline's written somewhere so I can be consistant and know what to look for prior to creating anymore.
I'm also not sure why Sumdac should redirect to Isaac Sumdac rather than Sari or being a disambig for the two. Couldn't either of them be referred to like this? Plus "Sari" redirects to Sari Sumdac yet the redirect from Isaac to Isaac Sumdac isn't allowed? I guess I'm not sure, it's like the dad's never called by his given name nor Sari by her surname, very confusing. Ty 01:17, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
- Categories generally require at least 7 members. Disambiguation pages are only created when there are at least 3 items with the same name. When there are just two, the unmodified name should redirect to one of them. Since "Sumdac" is used for Isaac most often, it redirects to him. Since there are no other "Isaac's", typing Isaac into the search box will automatically bring him up in the list. The "Sari Sumdac" page was created as "Sari" and later moved, leaving a redirect behind. It probably could be deleted, I'll make the recommendation.--Khajidha 06:04, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
Re: HOF
[edit]I based the inclusion on the toys shown at the Hall of Fame. Check them out here. I'm still waiting on the tribute videos to go online to see if Hasbro counts Cybertron Soundwave. Alientraveller 12:37, 6 June 2011 (EDT)
- I think you're putting a little too much emphasis on which toys were used for these rather random displays. For example, no RID Prime or Megatron is present in the displays but Hasbro said that no version of OP or Megs was eligible for the fan votes as they were automatically inducted as part of the first class. Similar language was used to exclude any version of Ironhide etc in this year's voting. --Khajidha 12:47, 6 June 2011 (EDT)
- I doubt they were that random. I don't think Hasbro considers Energon Ironhide the same character because he's a kid-appeal character as opposed to Optimus's gruff right-hand bot. That's why I'm waiting on the videos for a final check: we used the videos to determine which pages went into the category last year and mentioned the odd exception (the RID versions in their notes). Alientraveller 13:12, 6 June 2011 (EDT)
Username Origin
[edit](Original section title: Uh...) Where'd you get your name from? --Kaon Prisoner 21:44, 6 June 2011 (EDT)
- It was the magic word used by the Silver Age Blue Beetle. I think I may have misspelled it, though. --Khajidha 06:40, 7 June 2011 (EDT)
- I think you've got it right— that's how they spell it in the Blue Beetle (Jaime Reyes) comics (which are excellent), although I believe they put a space or a hyphen or somesuch in the middle. Nice username, strong approval, etc. --Bobcat2022 23:13, 10 July 2011 (EDT)
- Just to be a completist (I'm in the right place for that, yes?) I looked it up, and officially nowadays there's no second H ("da" instead of "dha"). Close enough for government work, though. --Bobcat2022 23:17, 10 July 2011 (EDT)
- Yeah, I think it's varied all over the place over the years. I've seen "kaji dha", "khaji da" and "khaji dha". I just kind of went with what looked coolest to me. --Khajidha 00:48, 11 July 2011 (EDT)
Gaea
[edit]Sorry about that. I didn't see that the note was a recent addition, and thought it was meant to be there.192.249.47.165 18:04, 29 June 2011 (EDT)
Brawl
[edit]While I agree that the entire script should not appear in the quotes section, what is there is far from approaching that.
Furthermore, I feel that the quotes I added are significant & add to the section since: 1) One shows a recurring theme of Spike's romantic interests and 2) The other is an rather adult quote for a kids show, much more deserving of the higher PG rating than the "bloody" comment. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if that was part of the reason it got that rating.
I didn't randomly pick these, and put some thought into it. I would argue that there are other quotes that add less to the section, but more importantly, the section is not so big that it would constitute the "entire script". Other episodes have larger quote sections with many more superficial quotes.
- 1)The recurring theme of Spike's romances is better handled as a note than a quote. 2)I think you are rather reaching for your adult interpretation. 3)We have been having discussions here about reducing quote sections. --Khajidha 06:53, 7 July 2011 (EDT)
- About the quote, Wise has said in an interview (I think the same one that said that Dion died) the visual with the screw was intentional, so I wouldn't be surprised about the quote. But that too would be better for a note than quote. Geewunling 07:24, 7 July 2011 (EDT)
- Interesting, Geewunling. I meant to mention earlier that part of why I had said what I said about the "entire script" was that (at least) one of the quotes that Brawl added was a continuation of a quote that was already there. --Khajidha 12:30, 7 July 2011 (EDT)
- About the quote, Wise has said in an interview (I think the same one that said that Dion died) the visual with the screw was intentional, so I wouldn't be surprised about the quote. But that too would be better for a note than quote. Geewunling 07:24, 7 July 2011 (EDT)
Comprised
[edit]God bless you for correcting people's use of "comprised". Srsly. JW 12:48, 12 July 2011 (EDT)
- My personal little grammatical bugbear. --Khajidha 20:22, 12 July 2011 (EDT)
Midnight Express
[edit]Revision history of "Midnight Express (RID)"
* (cur) (last) 20:05, 8 October 2011 Khajidha (Talk | contribs) (11,588 bytes) (all English variants are valid)
Fair enough, but why remove the Brave homage that I thought should be pointed out? <=I
- Mainly because I didn't notice that you had added something, I just took the page back to how it had been before you changed English variants. Looking back at it, I don't mind if that is re-added. --Khajidha 11:15, 21 October 2011 (EDT)
Alrighty then, I'll be adding it back. --Cannonfodder4000 11:09, 26 October 2011 (EDT)
Karussell
[edit]I brought some sense into it: Karussell--Nevermore 06:44, 31 October 2011 (EDT)
- Thanks, this is such a neglected corner of the history of the brand that any information is greatly appreciated. --Khajidha 08:08, 31 October 2011 (EDT)
Laserbeak (Prime)
[edit]I was reverting the 208 IP's caption-bastardry, which he had already gotten a warning for on his talk page. Am I not supposed to touch captions at all as an anon, even to revert bastardry?192.249.47.196 15:24, 4 November 2011 (EDT)
- Sorry, I missed the fact that you were reverting. Go right ahead with that. --Khajidha 15:51, 4 November 2011 (EDT)
- Oh! Well, thanks then, I'll get that done in a jiff.192.249.47.196 16:38, 4 November 2011 (EDT)
Voting
[edit]You can't vote for Grimlock or Shockwave. --Monzo 12:37, 23 February 2012 (EST)
- Sorry, I missed the listings for this year's automatic inductees. I've fixed that. --Khajidha 12:44, 23 February 2012 (EST)
IMAGE
[edit]excuse me can you say me where i can find some movie page without image? user:Shockwave1704
ops sorry but sometimes i don't know how to entitle my image user:Shockwave1704
Frank Welker
[edit]ah it's for this reason that soundwave spoke an american accent in roftuser:Shockwave1704
G. I. Joe
[edit]Which articles are you talking about?
The bit about the first Joe / TF crossover came from digging out my copy of issue #2 and updating Hawk's profile.
For the individual Joes, every time I touch the flavor text on an article it either comes straight from the file cards (what we TF fans know as tech specs) or from an official source such as the Order of Battle series. Ironhold 17:26, 2 April 2012 (EDT)
- I was asking about the individual characters. GI Joe file cards and the Order of Battle series are valid sources for a GI Joe wiki, but not for a Transformers one as they are not TF fiction. GI Joe-only fiction cannot be used as a source here. --Khajidha 18:41, 2 April 2012 (EDT)
- I've been creating Joe articles for a year now (give or take), in each case using the material to help do the flavor text, and with one or two exceptions no one's said anything before now. In fact, I'm the guy who created the articles on Joes like Wild Bill, Mutt, and Dial-Tone. Ironhold 08:49, 5 April 2012 (EDT)
Darkwing
[edit]Uh, the reason I did that was because the note was stretching out and covering part of the pic. (At least that's what happens on my screen.....) --81.164.215.61 12:00, 11 April 2012 (EDT)
- On my screen, your version left great heaping gobs of white space while the previous version had a broken note template. Perhaps we should let someone else weigh in on this. --Khajidha 12:08, 11 April 2012 (EDT)
Fish/Pelycosaur
[edit]First off, please don't interpret this as an argument, 'cause I know I'm not as familiar with pelycosaurs as I'd like to be, and I'm just curious here.
Regarding your edit to Dinosaur (dinosaur), you basically said that pelycosaur is to dinosaur as fish is to human, rather than dolphin is to human. I'm kind of confused about that, since aren't pelycosaurs and dinosaurs at least part of the same class Reptilia, while fish would be a totally different class? Or is this a timescale thing?192.249.47.177 18:02, 3 May 2012 (EDT)
- Pelycosaurs are not part of Reptilia as currently defined. Pelycosaurs and mammals are both part of Synapsida. It was not meant as a straightforward comparison, but rather a rough indication of the genetic distance between the two groups. Saying that a human is a fish is actually a more valid comparison, as mammals derive from groups commonly considered "fish" while neither dinosaurs nor pelycosaurs derived from the other. --Khajidha 18:28, 3 May 2012 (EDT)
Shattered Glass Wreck-Gar
[edit]"Do some actual work"? This isn't a bloody office job, you know. We're doing this in our spare time, and this site isn't supposed to be taken all that seriously, in case you hadn't noticed. I don't see what the problem is. You've said "policy is to revert" if the user hasn't done much else, but I had a look at the policies and I didn't see that. Besides, isn't inserting a vaguely relevant movie quote appropriate for a page about a character who speaks entirely in quotes? There was even a setup line there that I only had to tweak a little bit. How is that hurting the article? --Magnus Prime, 17 May 2012
- Yes, we are doing it in our spare time. BUT, there is a point to this website: it is a source of information about the Transformers brand and all of its components. If you are here to add to that, do so. If you are here just to show that you are funny, we're not interested. While the page is called Transformers Wiki:Caption, it has always been interpreted as applying to ALL humor here. Also, you may notice that someone else had reverted your changes the first time you made them. --Khajidha 07:18, 17 May 2012 (EDT)
- Alright, you win. --Magnus Prime, 17 May 2012
Not a Lame excuse
[edit]that "error" about Mikaela wasnt a lame excuse to look at Megan, i am not fully into girls yet, i just thought it was a mistake and i posted it
Sentient
[edit]According to the American Heritage Dictionary, the only correct pronunciation of "sentient" is so that it rhymes with "patient". What source are you using that approves of "sen-tee-ent"? JW 22:09, 20 July 2012 (EDT)
- Both are given at Macmillan Dictionary, Oxford Learners Dictionary and Merriam-Webster. --Khajidha 22:42, 20 July 2012 (EDT)
- Hurm. Wisdom received. JW 21:55, 21 July 2012 (EDT)
About Kup
[edit]My joke was a lot better than "I don't even like ice cream!" What does that joke have to do with Kup? Nothing.
- "________ callrd, he wants his ________ back" is not a good joke. Neither is "Not _______". Or any of the other things you tried. That's why you were reverted by several other people as well. The main point though, is that adding captions is a privilege that must be earned by making actual edits that add to the information available from this wiki. We don't exist just to make jokes, you know. --Khajidha 20:30, 3 October 2012 (EDT)
Re: Springer Edits
[edit]I wasn't being sexist about Arcee. I was suggesting that Rodimus (or the show) was being sexist about Arcee. But be honest; between G1 Arcee, Grimlock (ANY continuity) and G1 Springer, who would you choose? But while Springer certainly didn't want Roddy to die, his attitude towards getting the Matrix seemed to be a combination of "I don't want to be leader" and "Rodimus must be delirious to pick me". Harley Quinn hyenaholic 10:23, 9 November 2012 (EST)
KB Toys
[edit]Are you sure the clear Spychangers KB Toys exclusive in Car Robots? KB Toys is an American company, after all. --Flicky1991 16:44, 6 February 2013 (EST)
- I was going off the individual pages, if that is wrong go ahead and change them. All the RID Spychangers need to be gone back over again. --Khajidha 10:12, 7 February 2013 (EST)
- You're talking about the Hasbro versions. The part you edited was about the Takara versions, and the character pages say the clear Takara versions are variants, not exclusives. --Flicky1991 10:43, 7 February 2013 (EST)
- Oh. I must have gotten confused. I'll fix it, if you haven't already. --Khajidha 10:58, 7 February 2013 (EST)
- I have, but thanks! --Flicky1991 11:03, 7 February 2013 (EST)
- Oh. I must have gotten confused. I'll fix it, if you haven't already. --Khajidha 10:58, 7 February 2013 (EST)
- You're talking about the Hasbro versions. The part you edited was about the Takara versions, and the character pages say the clear Takara versions are variants, not exclusives. --Flicky1991 10:43, 7 February 2013 (EST)
Template:Comicstory/doc
[edit]You do realise editing the documentation page doesn't actually do anything, yes? - SanityOrMadness 16:26, 1 May 2013 (EDT)
- No, I didn't. How do you change things, then? --Khajidha 21:59, 1 May 2013 (EDT)
- In Template:Comicstory, add this to a likely spot (obviously replacing {{{variable x|}}}/'''Variable X''' with the relevant variable.
|-
{{#if: {{{variable x|}}} |
{{!}}'''Variable X''' {{!}}{{!}} {{{variable x|}}}}}
|-
- - SanityOrMadness 21:47, 2 May 2013 (EDT)
- Thanks. --Khajidha 21:56, 2 May 2013 (EDT)
- - SanityOrMadness 21:47, 2 May 2013 (EDT)
Your Revenge of Bruticus edit
[edit]I'm confused as to the intent of this edit. Your edit reason is about something being too much speculation, and about confusing "implicit" with "explicit", but all the actual edit did was just restore a note I removed. --flicky1991 15:00, 14 August 2013 (EDT)
- Sorry, meant to go back one more revision. --Khajidha 18:35, 14 August 2013 (EDT)
nbsp
[edit]It keeps the names from being split across two lines at smaller browser window sizes. Can it be readded?KrytenKoro (talk) 10:07, 19 February 2014 (EST)
- Sure, I just did it. I had removed them as Mimi had readded them without a reason after Primeformer had asked for one. --Khajidha (talk) 10:19, 19 February 2014 (EST)
"Boy racer"
[edit]Slang in UK for a new driver - usually young and male, hence the name - who speeds, etc. - SanityOrMadness (talk) 12:43, 20 February 2015 (EST)
- Huh. I still fail to see how he could have a "boy racer" as an altmode, then. --Khajidha (talk) 12:57, 20 February 2015 (EST)
- Same way you can have a rapper car, or a footballer car. It's a car associated with the stereotype.
- (You will, of course, notice I didn't revert your revert. This is purely for reference!). - SanityOrMadness (talk) 13:57, 20 February 2015 (EST)
Cerebros disambiguation
[edit]Sorry about that. I meant to link to the Wikipedia article for the X-Men computer Cerebro. Which I wanted to get another opinion on, do you suppose it would be useful for this wiki? S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 18:07, 21 July 2015 (EDT)
- Probably not directly helpful. The cerebrum one can probably stay, as it is the source of the name and is somewhat funny, but an X-Men reference is probably a little too much. You might could add a joke of some sort based on it to one of the character pages, but I am not in a position to give you permission to do so. --Khajidha (talk) 18:10, 21 July 2015 (EDT)
- Gotcha, thanks. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 18:15, 21 July 2015 (EDT)
More GoBots
[edit]On community portal. Check it out. --Giggidy (talk) 21:30, 6 January 2016 (EST)
Question
[edit]Hi, um. Bit of an awkward question, but are you trans? And if so, which pronouns do you prefer? Sorry if I'm bothering you. Escargon (talk) 20:59, 19 June 2016 (EDT)
- Not a bother at all. I am a dual-role transvestite. I have both a male and a female identity. I do not wish to transition, but am uncomfortable if I am not able to be my femme-self for long periods of time. I prefer that people use the pronouns that match my presentation at the time. On here you can use whichever you wish. --Khajidha (talk) 04:51, 20 June 2016 (EDT)
Hi Guy/Gal
[edit]Hi, i'm Norev Durok.
I see you're not too happy about the "Seeker Scout" page that I've created. --Norev Durok
- Hi, Norev. I'm actually happy someone is trying to write up the Seeker Scouts (it's been a red link for a while), but there are some problems with the page. The paragraph under "Decepticon campaign" should start with a capital letter and should be written "in universe". Talking about "intro sequences" and "Autobot and Decepticon Campaigns" is "out of universe". Remember to write about the events as if they actually happened, not as part of a game. I'm also not clear about what the caption is trying to say. Do not take any of this as an attack on you, I just want you to become the best editor you can be.--Khajidha (talk) 21:24, 21 August 2016 (EDT)
Hi, Khajidha. Ok then, i'll see if I can give it a few more edits, i'm glad that you're happy about completing this pages. Trust me when I say that the Seeker Scouts won't be the only page that it's going from "Red link to Blue link".
Also, what happened to:
"Omnibot Scout 1", "Omnibot Scout 2", "Omnibot Warrior", "Aerialbot Warrior", and "Seeker Warrior"?
Because before I've even started to complete this pages, some of them indicate that the pages did actually had some info, but were deleted.--Norev Durok (talk).
- I think that most of those pages had been made before, but they were nowhere near complete and did not follow our layout or writing styles. Rather than have poorly constructed pages, it was decided to delete them until someone came along with the knowledge and will to complete them properly.--Khajidha (talk) 14:36, 22 August 2016 (EDT)
- Ok then, but i'll need help if i'm gonna complete those page, voice actors for example, let's say that "I don't have a good ear for voice acting"..--Norev Durok (talk).
Ok then, i'll fill them with a few more info.--Norev Durok (talk).
Unused Content?
[edit]Hi, it's Norev Durok again.
Question: should any unused content be posted here?
I know It may be "out of universe", but I know that there's so much unused content in "Transformers: The Game", that if it have been used, it would have explained so much things about the game.
examples:
Autobot Campaign: it would explain why Bonecrusher is nowhere to be found.
Decepticon Campaign: it would explain why Bumblebee is nowhere to be found after "Level 2", when "level 3"'s ending states that Bumblebee survived and has got the Allspark, but in "level 4" it is Jazz who has the Allspark. *1.
- 1: I say "Level X" because I don't remember those levels names.--Norev Durok (talk).
Yooo
[edit]Your userpic and caption is friggin amazing Avalanche (talk) 02:21, 29 January 2017 (EST)
Script readings and other stuff
[edit]Dunno if you noticed, but there's been some stuff digged up recently that was missing/unavailable to the public for the time being. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B7b1Q4_nEXnZWlpCUHRnZ2ozdTA https://www.allspark.com/forums/topic/129168-searching-for-old-club-content/
Hope you enjoy. Escargon (talk) 14:04, 31 January 2017 (EST)
edit I made to Kremzeek
[edit]How do you mean where you say 'that's not a triumph, that's a joke'? The Decepticons do triumph over the Autobots, in this episode (since, like I said, which is even my source for my edit, I've seen the episode, and the Autobots still aren't rid of Kremzeek at the end of the episode). Chris rabbit (talk) 10:59, 4 April 2017 (EDT)Chris rabbit
- I've seen it, too, and the clear implication is that the Autobots are going to defeat that Kremzeek as well. Otherwise there would be no further episodes. It's a joke, a "here we go again" gag.--Khajidha (talk) 11:05, 4 April 2017 (EDT)
my edit on The Latest RID episode
[edit]So your edit Says Fixed Grammer Spelling and all that, and out of universe context, My synopis I thought was just fine, When I removed the Pictures a mistake, and I didn't know how to get them back, But While my Synopious wasn't that great, It was something to hold over til a proper Edit was made, plus I thought it had decent humour, So instead of Letting it stay until a proper Synopios was placed, or just simply putting back the pictures, Why did you Trmoved my hard Work? I would like a explanation, (sorry for my bad typing t this moment, I only have my phone to use RN)
- You specifically point out that it's a crap edit in the edit summary. That clearly tells people it wasn't "just fine". Item42 (talk) 10:22, 31 October 2017 (EDT)
- I did not say I fixed it. I gave the reasons it was removed. It was not "just fine", it wasn't even English. And your post here isn't any better. If you cannot properly use your phone to post legible material, I would suggest not posting here from your phone. If your typing and English skills are no better than you have shown so far no matter what device you use, I would suggest not contributing here at all.--Khajidha (talk) 12:14, 31 October 2017 (EDT)
Comprise and compose
[edit]Just an FYI, "comprise" sometimes in place of "compose" decisively won a place in English lexicon a long time ago. Now I'm not about to spend my time stopping you, but I'm just telling you that you'll have about as much success standing against this phenomenon as you would against "less" for "fewer", singular "they", or split infinitives. People just ain't going to believe your rule. S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 15:04, 12 December 2017 (EST)
From: iiVexitory
[edit]Khajidha, Please don't remove any information I put on Transformers articles unless discussed with me beforehand. I work pretty hard to acquire most of this information and share it with other fans through this site. Thanks :)
Sorry
[edit]Sorry for changing captions. Kampungpisangadrian (talk) 09:46, 24 March 2018 (EDT)kampungpisangadrianKampungpisangadrian (talk) 09:46, 24 March 2018 (EDT)
Page Deletion/Renaming
[edit]I have relocated every regarding "Movie" Jetfire to the page about Revenge of the Fallen Jetfire. But in order to rename the bigger page "Jetfire (Movie)", the smaller page under that name must be deleted. NexusShard17 (talk) 15:58, 08 September 2018 (EDT)
Remove Redirect from Icon
[edit]While I thank your help with removing the redirect with the Elite Guard logo, the Shattered Glass Autobot and Decepticon Elite Guard logos still have the redirection to when the page was called "Cybertron Elite Guard". If you have a chance, could you please help with that?--NexusShard17 (talk) 12:28, 5 October 2018 (EDT)
That large Tailgate storyarc image
[edit]You just messed up a massive edit to the still ongoing image description I was trying to do with a tiny typo correction of yours, arrrgghhh. And I've already spent so much time on the image itself...--Nevermore (talk) 17:14, 17 January 2019 (EST)
.jpg files
[edit]Hey, thanks for correcting me; if you want I can also change the file extensions in others images that I've uploaded (like Chuck from Angry Birds). RoboWarriorPrime 08 February 2019.
Abuse from User:KS7564
[edit]U FUKING IDIOT !!! (talk)
Yes, that exists
[edit]https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/theme
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/theme
"Theme" can be a verb. Would you like to dramatically question my sanity again? S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 07:13, 10 June 2019 (EDT)
- 1) I wasn't questioning its use as a verb, just the specific construction "themed on". I had never seen that particular construction and it sounded extremely odd to me. Checking around since you posted here, I have found it in use. 2) I wasn't questioning your sanity, I was questioning the grammar. --Khajidha (talk) 12:15, 10 June 2019 (EDT)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for helping me with my user page. I've been frequenting the wiki for a while, but I'm not good with that type of thing. Just appreciate it. I still don't get your logic on how Bumblebee's not it's own continuity, but whatever. --ChangingFate 12:26, 17 October 2019 (EDT)
Hello Khajidha, just wanted to thank you for correcting my phrases in the pages I create! I am doing my best in English but it is very nice from you to take time to correct me. I should try to remember these corrections, I noticed that I often do the same mistakes! :) --SoundSky (talk) 16:03, 10 June 2020 (EDT)
I'M GETTING TIRED OF IT
[edit]1st, i'am not making any "SUPPOSITION" that there is a connection, because i'm not a speculation, fanfiction and supposition creator, since i only like to pass official information about everything that exists about transformers, and i would edit only if i found a piece of information that it's not in the article, or if i found something that's not correct about it to fix-it, and 2nd, sure Hasbro and Takara may had never said that these figures are the same characters as the yellow bulldozer and dump truck in the movie, but if the figures have the same vehicle mode as the yellow bulldozer and yellow dump truck, than it's indeed an official media that Skipjack and Payload are the bulldozer and dump truck in the movie, now three questions, 1st, why didn't you read the entire "I'm back" part from the discussion section to understand my situation?, 2nd why did you wrote something like this to offend me? and 3rd, why are you talking to me instead of Riptide talking to me in first place? anyways go ahead, continue your offense againts me, because i want you all to know that Hasbro and Takara Tomy are releasing an Studio Series Skipjack, meaning that Skipjack is the yellow bulldozer that forms the left foot, and if Hasbro and Takara Tomy release an Studio Series Payload in the future, than it means that Payload is the yellow dump truck that forms the left leg, and if this happens, it means that everything i'm saying about Skipjack and Payload being the yellow bulldozer and dump truck is true!, and one final thing, if what saying turn out to be true, DON'T TELL ME I DIN'T WARNED YOU!. so Khadija, I HATE YOU BECAUSE OF WHAT YOU SAID TO ME, AND PLEASE DON'T ANSWER THE QUESTIONS ABOVE, BECAUSE NOW I'M VERY VERY VERY ANNOYED! bye. --Transformersbrasil (talk) 20:36, 20 February 2020 (EST)
- "Hasbro and Takara may had never said that these figures are the same characters as the yellow bulldozer and dump truck in the movie". Again, this is the relevant point. They never said that this toy represents this character in the movie. You are assuming that they are. 1) I did read it. I pointed out to you how your understanding was flawed. 2) I did not write to offend you. I wrote to try to explain the problem you were having. 3) I thought that you might listen to someone else, since you did not seem to pay attention to Riptide. As your dispute is with the general policies of this site, discussion is not limited to you and Riptide. Notice that Escargon, M Sipher, and Grum had also pointed out to you that your edits were not following policy. Finally, your anger and refusal to listen is not helping you. --Khajidha (talk) 20:49, 20 February 2020 (EST)
Reversion
[edit]Hey, I noticed you reverted my quote edit on Cosmic Rust? I don't mind; I'd just like to know the reasoning behind it so I can avoid making similar mistakes in the future :D Hellzapoppin (talk) 23:34, 14 July 2020 (EDT)
- It simply isn't memorable on its own. Qotations from episodes should be as short as possible and still be effective. They should need little or no scene description. --Khajidha (talk) 11:36, 15 July 2020 (EDT)
- I disagree on its memorability as my friends and I refer to it sometimes, but I will respect your wishes as someone who's been here longer than I have and duly note your criticism. Hellzapoppin (talk) 13:52, 15 July 2020 (EDT)
Your input is requested
[edit]Talk:Decepticon Super Scramble#Recommended buy 4 out of 5 combiners
Thanks.
Rhymus (talk) 00:19, 30 January 2021 (EST)
Mainframe reversion
[edit]Can I ask the reason for reverting my note under Mainframe? I think it's very much worth noting that his appearance on the cover of FHE FFoD VHS is oddly less bizarre in retrospect as a result of the Kingdom toy.Tjfosko (talk) 16:56, 12 May 2021 (EDT)
- In the second reversion, after I edited my original note, you state there's no evidence that the Kingdom toy is meant to retcon previous fiction. I don't intend to get into a reversion war or anything, and I want this to be an actual discussion about the merits of the note, so here's the way I see it:
- 1) The statement that there is "no evidence" that the Kingdom toy is meant to retcon previous fiction is inaccurate. The Kingdom toy is listed on both G1 Mainframe's and Teletraan I's pages and is clearly meant to represent both of those characters/computers/concepts. I.e., it is a toy of Teletraan I as it appeared in the cartoon, and the very fact that Mainframe and Teletraan I are now the same toy is evidence. I'm a lawyer by trade, and it more or less follows the test for relevance that the Federal (and most state) Rules of Evidence espouses "Evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action." In other words, the fact that Mainframe and Teletraan I are ever the same makes it more probable that they are at other times the same.
- 2) Obviously, Mainframe and Teletraan I are not the same in every continuity, as there are times Mainframe appears in stories that follow the G1 cartoon in which he is clearly a separate individual (barring specific retcons). That said, I purposely qualified the note with "arguably" for that reason. Additionally, it's merely a note rather than an extreme measure like proposing the pages be merged or something. It's meant to point out something interesting, and it does not in anyway detract from the article, nor is it inaccurate information.
- 3) Retcons are not always explicit, anyway, and can even be unintended consequences of introducing new information. I'm not sure lack of intent (or, rather, lack of evidence of intent) is enough to say a retcon hasn't occurred.
- Now, I feel that's a pretty well-reasoned justification for a short note. Can you explain what is wrong with my reasoning?Tjfosko (talk) 12:07, 13 May 2021 (EDT)
- It's not justifying the VHS cover, it's noting the coincidental irony of it. The note I proposed is accurate information and is of some interest. I don't see how it's contrary to any policy of the Wiki. Tjfosko (talk) 13:06, 13 May 2021 (EDT)
- You note was not "accurate information", as it insinuated that a toy released in 2021 had a retroactive influence on a '80s cartoon's continuity, which is nonsensical. We're not assuming that the Ark in the cartoon transforms into a gigantic robot just because the toy does. Art of Mainframe appearing on the cover of a concurrently released VHS, the cartoon's continuity, and a Mainframe toy transforming into a computer three decades later under the precepts of a new story are not related concepts. Saix (talk) 14:23, 13 May 2021 (EDT)
- It's not justifying the VHS cover, it's noting the coincidental irony of it. The note I proposed is accurate information and is of some interest. I don't see how it's contrary to any policy of the Wiki. Tjfosko (talk) 13:06, 13 May 2021 (EDT)
- My note pointed out that Hasbro saying that Mainframe is Teletraan I COULD serve as a retcon. Heck, with all the continuities and micro-continuities, there could be an official story showing Mainframe transforming into Teletraan I right before the Ark launches in MTMTE, and it STILL wouldn't be true in every iteration. My note was not a definitive statement, and, again, it was a note for the sake of interest. And the Ark having a toy with a robot mode doesn't suddenly mean it did in the G1 cartoon, but it suggests the possibility. The note didn't say "The VHS cover is now accurate." It was saying, "Hey, look at this. Funnily enough, since Teletraan I was there, you could say Mainframe was there if you were so inclined. Weird, huh?"
- What you seem to be saying is that it is impossible for Hasbro to retcon things in the G1 cartoon, which is truly nonsensical. Especially since one of the Ark's destinies in the cards released with the figures is to reactivate in 1984 and impliedly start the G1 cartoon continuity.
- I've spent way too much time arguing over this, but the deletion of an innocuous note for such a point of interest is just baffling to me. Since the Wiki's purpose is to provide information with a secondary goal of being funny, I thought "funny information" fit within that purview.Tjfosko (talk) 14:57, 13 May 2021 (EDT)