Talk:Micro-bug: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If this is an excess to have this article, then remove it, it's fine. It's just the fact that it played a prominent role in the episode ''and'' it got a name call-out that makes me think it should have it's own article. [[User:TheMZone|TheMZone]] 20:40, 9 November 2010 (EST) | If this is an excess to have this article, then remove it, it's fine. It's just the fact that it played a prominent role in the episode ''and'' it got a name call-out that makes me think it should have it's own article. [[User:TheMZone|TheMZone]] 20:40, 9 November 2010 (EST) | ||
:It should have a page... but said page needs to be properly formatted. Intro blurb, fiction section, categories, that little thing in italics that indicates what it is and which continuity it's from, etc. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 20:49, 9 November 2010 (EST) | :It should have a page... but said page needs to be properly formatted. Intro blurb, fiction section, categories, that little thing in italics that indicates what it is and which continuity it's from, etc. --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 20:49, 9 November 2010 (EST) | ||
::Thank you for clarifying. I was under the impression that smaller articles, like turbofox or dynametal duck, don't need formatting. Now are they the exception, or in need of cleanup? [[User:TheMZone|TheMZone]] 00:31, 10 November 2010 (EST) | |||
:::I'd say cleanup... --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 00:43, 10 November 2010 (EST) | |||
::::Also Megatron calls it a "micro-bug". --[[User:Abates|abates]] 00:52, 10 November 2010 (EST) | |||
:::::Thanks for the help and cleanup! I thought I heard Megs call it a Robo-bug, but I might have hearing problems. [[User:TheMZone|TheMZone]] | |||
::::::I think there was a sound effect partially over that line which wouldn't help (and frankly robo-bug would have made more sense, since the thing is not very micro) --[[User:Abates|abates]] 16:15, 10 November 2010 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:15, 10 November 2010
If this is an excess to have this article, then remove it, it's fine. It's just the fact that it played a prominent role in the episode and it got a name call-out that makes me think it should have it's own article. TheMZone 20:40, 9 November 2010 (EST)
- It should have a page... but said page needs to be properly formatted. Intro blurb, fiction section, categories, that little thing in italics that indicates what it is and which continuity it's from, etc. --Detour 20:49, 9 November 2010 (EST)
- Thank you for clarifying. I was under the impression that smaller articles, like turbofox or dynametal duck, don't need formatting. Now are they the exception, or in need of cleanup? TheMZone 00:31, 10 November 2010 (EST)
- I'd say cleanup... --Detour 00:43, 10 November 2010 (EST)
- Also Megatron calls it a "micro-bug". --abates 00:52, 10 November 2010 (EST)
- Thanks for the help and cleanup! I thought I heard Megs call it a Robo-bug, but I might have hearing problems. TheMZone
- I think there was a sound effect partially over that line which wouldn't help (and frankly robo-bug would have made more sense, since the thing is not very micro) --abates 16:15, 10 November 2010 (EST)
- Thanks for the help and cleanup! I thought I heard Megs call it a Robo-bug, but I might have hearing problems. TheMZone
- Also Megatron calls it a "micro-bug". --abates 00:52, 10 November 2010 (EST)
- I'd say cleanup... --Detour 00:43, 10 November 2010 (EST)
- Thank you for clarifying. I was under the impression that smaller articles, like turbofox or dynametal duck, don't need formatting. Now are they the exception, or in need of cleanup? TheMZone 00:31, 10 November 2010 (EST)
