Talk:Structure: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
Rosicrucian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I'd think an article on exo-structure would be more logical. | :I'd think an article on exo-structure would be more logical. | ||
:Nothign that the whole body was called a Structure in one G1 ep would make more sense as a sub-set of that. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 20:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC)<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | :Nothign that the whole body was called a Structure in one G1 ep would make more sense as a sub-set of that. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 20:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
::Spotlight: Nightbeat referred to the vehicle kibble as superstructure, which is what I'm recalling it from.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]]<div id="wikia-credits"><br /><br /><small>From [http://transformers.wikia.com Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki], a [http://www.wikia.com Wikia] wiki.</small></div> | |||
Revision as of 20:29, 10 August 2007
I'm not sure this article is really justified... I haven't watched the episode recently, but, is this word really presented as specialized terminology rather than just as... like, English? Is the superstructure/substructure stuff supported by canon? I don't want us to be falsely implying that these are specific, "real" terms rather than just normal words. --Steve-o 20:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'd think an article on exo-structure would be more logical.
- Nothign that the whole body was called a Structure in one G1 ep would make more sense as a sub-set of that. -Derik 20:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Spotlight: Nightbeat referred to the vehicle kibble as superstructure, which is what I'm recalling it from.--Rosicrucian
