Talk:Spychanger: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
== Woof!== | == Woof!== | ||
This page is kind of ... well, very inaccurate. Frankly, there's probably more Spy Changers who aren't in the RID group than are, yet this page is entirely about the RID group. Spy Changers went on for years! --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 01:43, 31 March 2009 (EDT) | This page is kind of ... well, very inaccurate. Frankly, there's probably more Spy Changers who aren't in the RID group than are, yet this page is entirely about the RID group. Spy Changers went on for years! --[[User:ItsWalky|ItsWalky]] 01:43, 31 March 2009 (EDT) | ||
:At this point, is "Spy Changer" a group designation or is it more of a technology designation? I mean, there were plenty of Spy Changers outside of RiD, right? It almost feels like "Spy Changer" isn't a subteam, it's more of a feature, like "Combiners" or "Triple Changers," you know? [[User:Hooper X|Hooper_X]] 09:11, 31 March 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:11, 31 March 2009
... G1 continuty? What the hell? --M Sipher 01:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, that was my fault. I was typing quick and I usually only write entries for G1 folks so I did it without even noticing. ZacWilliam 02:19, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Universe
There was some info on this wiki about a voice actor play with the G1 Spy Changers. I can't find it now. Would that info belong here, or in a different artiicle, because they were from a Spy Changer universe or something? --Crockalley 04:04, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- There was an OTFCC 04(?) script reading, yeah, in which Spychangers played a part. I don't really remember much of it, sadly. It should be at least mentioned in this article. --ItsWalky 05:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
"Mostly" Autobots? Who's the exception? --MCRG 08:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Dear Me- The answer is Scourge, doofus. --MCRG 08:18, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
One of the things I didn't know for sure was IF the Universe releases were specifically called Spy Changers? Is it on their packages? What about the later ones like Camshaft? Are they all officially SCs. I couldn't remember exactly who falls under the title. - ZacWilliam 14:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Does the OTFCC script reading call them Spy Changers? --Crockalley 14:44, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- No. -LV 00:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Parsing
Is it "Spy Changer" or "Spychanger", as per the category? Interrobang 08:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- As is all too often the case, both. (I prefer Spy Changers because that was used first.) -LV 00:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Which set is the e-hobby SC's -Derik 21:43, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
eHobby spies?
Which set is the eHobby set? Is that the Super Spy Changers? -75.168.123.161 14:52, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Woof!
This page is kind of ... well, very inaccurate. Frankly, there's probably more Spy Changers who aren't in the RID group than are, yet this page is entirely about the RID group. Spy Changers went on for years! --ItsWalky 01:43, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
- At this point, is "Spy Changer" a group designation or is it more of a technology designation? I mean, there were plenty of Spy Changers outside of RiD, right? It almost feels like "Spy Changer" isn't a subteam, it's more of a feature, like "Combiners" or "Triple Changers," you know? Hooper_X 09:11, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
