Talk:Toy swapping: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Rosicrucian (talk | contribs) m Unprotected "Talk:Toy swapping": Well, the talkpage doesn't need protected. |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Autoconfirm seems appropriate here. If someone has the balls to remove the line about toy-swapping being "undesirable," let them register for a screen name so we can mock them to their face. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 19:51, 28 May 2009 (EDT) | :Autoconfirm seems appropriate here. If someone has the balls to remove the line about toy-swapping being "undesirable," let them register for a screen name so we can mock them to their face. -[[User:Derik|Derik]] 19:51, 28 May 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Sounds like a ''much'' better plan to me.--[[User:AWT88|AWT88]] 19:55, 28 May 2009 (EDT) | ::Sounds like a ''much'' better plan to me.--[[User:AWT88|AWT88]] 19:55, 28 May 2009 (EDT) | ||
*forehead smack* Protected the wrong bit of the page! - [[User:Chris McFeely|Chris McFeely]] 20:01, 28 May 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 00:01, 29 May 2009
Does anyone think this page should be semi-protected or something? I mean, it's been "enhanced" a few times in the span of 2 days (probably by the self entitled douche bags the article speaks of). What's the consensus?--AWT88 19:47, 28 May 2009 (EDT)
- Autoconfirm seems appropriate here. If someone has the balls to remove the line about toy-swapping being "undesirable," let them register for a screen name so we can mock them to their face. -Derik 19:51, 28 May 2009 (EDT)
- Sounds like a much better plan to me.--AWT88 19:55, 28 May 2009 (EDT)
- forehead smack* Protected the wrong bit of the page! - Chris McFeely 20:01, 28 May 2009 (EDT)
