Talk:Rook (SG): Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
:I'm with Geewunling here, when the caption first got tacked up I thought it was pretty darn fitting. --[[User:Jeysie|Jeysie]] 17:28, 22 November 2009 (EST)
:I'm with Geewunling here, when the caption first got tacked up I thought it was pretty darn fitting. --[[User:Jeysie|Jeysie]] 17:28, 22 November 2009 (EST)
::Heck, I don't even see what's so offensive about it.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 17:42, 22 November 2009 (EST)
::Heck, I don't even see what's so offensive about it.--[[User:Rosicrucian|Rosicrucian]][[User Talk:Rosicrucian|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 17:42, 22 November 2009 (EST)
:::It's describing Bill O'Riley, a real world commentator, as a a liar and a government shill. I wish to see it removed. [[Special:Contributions/68.61.240.172|68.61.240.172]] 19:24, 22 November 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 00:24, 23 November 2009

Two words:

Rook's Screwed. ---Blackout- 12:15, 20 September 2009 (EDT)

Please do make make offensive political comments on this page. Surely you can think of a better joke. 68.61.240.172 15:53, 22 November 2009 (EST)

Surely you can be a little less sensitive? No one is actually trying to insult the man. Khajidha 15:59, 22 November 2009 (EST)
If we let every so-and-so anon decide to remove captions they deem offensive, this site'd be a humourous as a grandmother's funeral. Besides, it's satire. 82.5.78.143 16:21, 22 November 2009 (EST) (MGN, apparently not signed in)
I'm with Geewunling here, when the caption first got tacked up I thought it was pretty darn fitting. --Jeysie 17:28, 22 November 2009 (EST)
Heck, I don't even see what's so offensive about it.--RosicrucianTalk 17:42, 22 November 2009 (EST)
It's describing Bill O'Riley, a real world commentator, as a a liar and a government shill. I wish to see it removed. 68.61.240.172 19:24, 22 November 2009 (EST)