Talk:Lockdown (ROTF): Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Karhukjnsi (talk | contribs) New page: Seriously, we know he's going to be a bounty hunter, he's based off a bounty hunter, official release or not, his card states he's a bounty hunter. This isn't anything close to anything o... |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Seriously, we know he's going to be a bounty hunter, he's based off a bounty hunter, official release or not, his card states he's a bounty hunter. This isn't anything close to anything offensive, so why are you so up in arms against a CORRECT categorization? - Karhukjnsi | Seriously, we know he's going to be a bounty hunter, he's based off a bounty hunter, official release or not, his card states he's a bounty hunter. This isn't anything close to anything offensive, so why are you so up in arms against a CORRECT categorization? - Karhukjnsi {{unsigned|Karhukjnsi}} | ||
:So I take it then you ''haven't'' read the [[Help:Official info|official info help page]] that the Scoop Bastard notice links to, then? --[[User:Detour|Detour]] 02:28, 6 January 2010 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 07:28, 6 January 2010
Seriously, we know he's going to be a bounty hunter, he's based off a bounty hunter, official release or not, his card states he's a bounty hunter. This isn't anything close to anything offensive, so why are you so up in arms against a CORRECT categorization? - Karhukjnsi —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Karhukjnsi (talk • contribs).
- So I take it then you haven't read the official info help page that the Scoop Bastard notice links to, then? --Detour 02:28, 6 January 2010 (EST)
